37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 122516 |
Time | |
Date | 198909 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : orh |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 8200 flight time type : 2900 |
ASRS Report | 122516 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Weather |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
During the second approach visibility contact was made at minimums. At approximately xa T/D was accomplished about 1000' down the runway on centerline with slight left carburetor. Moderate rain was encountered during that approach and landing. Actual wind was not available, but had been reported from the east. After T/D the aircraft veered to the left and all attempts to steer to the right seemed futile. The aircraft departed the left side of the runway for approximately 1000'. At this time I was not positive this had occurred; however, inspection of the aircraft at the gate confirmed this suspicion along with a check of the runway. During the inspection of the runway it was noted that there was considerable amount of standing water and the runway is not grooved. I believe this had a great bearing on my situation, causing some hydroplaning. Also, the lack of accurate WX, as from an operating control tower, was a factor.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: RWY EXCURSION.
Narrative: DURING THE SECOND APCH VIS CONTACT WAS MADE AT MINIMUMS. AT APPROX XA T/D WAS ACCOMPLISHED ABOUT 1000' DOWN THE RWY ON CENTERLINE WITH SLIGHT LEFT CARB. MODERATE RAIN WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING THAT APCH AND LNDG. ACTUAL WIND WAS NOT AVAILABLE, BUT HAD BEEN RPTED FROM THE E. AFTER T/D THE ACFT VEERED TO THE LEFT AND ALL ATTEMPTS TO STEER TO THE RIGHT SEEMED FUTILE. THE ACFT DEPARTED THE LEFT SIDE OF THE RWY FOR APPROX 1000'. AT THIS TIME I WAS NOT POSITIVE THIS HAD OCCURRED; HOWEVER, INSPECTION OF THE ACFT AT THE GATE CONFIRMED THIS SUSPICION ALONG WITH A CHK OF THE RWY. DURING THE INSPECTION OF THE RWY IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF STANDING WATER AND THE RWY IS NOT GROOVED. I BELIEVE THIS HAD A GREAT BEARING ON MY SITUATION, CAUSING SOME HYDROPLANING. ALSO, THE LACK OF ACCURATE WX, AS FROM AN OPERATING CTL TWR, WAS A FACTOR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.