37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1236895 |
Time | |
Date | 201501 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | DC-10 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Horizontal Stabilizer |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Maintenance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural FAR |
Narrative:
Departed on a maintenance ferry flight with a cracked ths tail spar in our aircraft; no documentation. We were informed by a mechanic on arrival that this was the reason for the input of this aircraft to this maintenance facility. We were never told by anyone...prior to our first block out. (Coincidentally; the first attempt to takeoff resulted in a rejected takeoff at 60 KIAS for severe aircraft shuddering later attributed to both nose tires being significantly out of round and having to be replaced before we departed). We had thought this flight to be a routine input for periodic maintenance/inspection.the implications of this event as described are self-explanatory regarding the boxes checked above as causal.proper documentation and notification to the crew would have been appropriate. I also think a test flight crew should have been tasked with this flight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An MD-11 flight crew was alarmed to learn after landing that they had ferried the aircraft to a maintenance base for repair of a 'THS Tail Spar' rather than routine inspections. They had not been advised of the structural discrepancy.
Narrative: Departed on a maintenance ferry flight with a cracked THS Tail Spar in our aircraft; no documentation. We were informed by a mechanic on arrival that this was the reason for the input of this aircraft to this maintenance facility. We were never told by anyone...prior to our first block out. (Coincidentally; the first attempt to takeoff resulted in a rejected takeoff at 60 KIAS for severe aircraft shuddering later attributed to both nose tires being significantly out of round and having to be replaced before we departed). We had thought this flight to be a routine input for periodic maintenance/inspection.The implications of this event as described are self-explanatory regarding the boxes checked above as causal.Proper documentation and notification to the crew would have been appropriate. I also think a test flight crew should have been tasked with this flight.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.