37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 126177 |
Time | |
Date | 198910 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bos |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 250 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bos |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 140 flight time total : 8000 flight time type : 2300 |
ASRS Report | 126177 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Flying an air carrier trip from bna to bos we experienced several delays into the bos area due to an RVR meter being inoperative. After holding for 20 mins we were vectored for an approach to runway 15R. After being turned over to the tower we were told that the previous 3 aircraft had missed the approach. Minimums for that approach were 250', DH, current visibility was RVR 4000 variable. At 300' we had the lead in lights for the runway and at 250' we had the runway threshold. After making a normal landing and clearing the runway we realized that the altimeters were off 130'. Neither the ATIS we had received prior to starting the approach, nor the company change over report indicated that the pressure was falling rapidly. Our company procedures call for not using the radar altimeters on a category I approach, due to the possibility of uneven terrain or buildings in the approach path. I feel that there should be more of an effort to inform flight crews that pressure is changing rapidly, this information should come from ATIS, the company, and the tower when landing clearance is issued. ATIS that was available one hour later mentioned the pressure falling rapidly.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLT CREW OF MLG ALLEGES THAT ON APCH TO 15R AT BOS THEY HAD THE THRESHOLD LIGHTS AT 250 AGL AND LANDED. AFTER LNDG FLT CREW ALLEGES ALTIMETER WAS 130' OFF.
Narrative: FLYING AN AIR CARRIER TRIP FROM BNA TO BOS WE EXPERIENCED SEVERAL DELAYS INTO THE BOS AREA DUE TO AN RVR METER BEING INOPERATIVE. AFTER HOLDING FOR 20 MINS WE WERE VECTORED FOR AN APCH TO RWY 15R. AFTER BEING TURNED OVER TO THE TWR WE WERE TOLD THAT THE PREVIOUS 3 ACFT HAD MISSED THE APCH. MINIMUMS FOR THAT APCH WERE 250', DH, CURRENT VISIBILITY WAS RVR 4000 VARIABLE. AT 300' WE HAD THE LEAD IN LIGHTS FOR THE RWY AND AT 250' WE HAD THE RWY THRESHOLD. AFTER MAKING A NORMAL LNDG AND CLEARING THE RWY WE REALIZED THAT THE ALTIMETERS WERE OFF 130'. NEITHER THE ATIS WE HAD RECEIVED PRIOR TO STARTING THE APCH, NOR THE COMPANY CHANGE OVER REPORT INDICATED THAT THE PRESSURE WAS FALLING RAPIDLY. OUR COMPANY PROCS CALL FOR NOT USING THE RADAR ALTIMETERS ON A CATEGORY I APCH, DUE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF UNEVEN TERRAIN OR BUILDINGS IN THE APCH PATH. I FEEL THAT THERE SHOULD BE MORE OF AN EFFORT TO INFORM FLT CREWS THAT PRESSURE IS CHANGING RAPIDLY, THIS INFORMATION SHOULD COME FROM ATIS, THE COMPANY, AND THE TWR WHEN LNDG CLRNC IS ISSUED. ATIS THAT WAS AVAILABLE ONE HOUR LATER MENTIONED THE PRESSURE FALLING RAPIDLY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.