37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1338714 |
Time | |
Date | 201603 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Large Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 156 Flight Crew Type 11000 |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 190 Flight Crew Type 3200 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Ground Incursion Taxiway |
Narrative:
Confusion on taxi clearance with ground control led to wrong execution of desired taxi instructions. First officer contributed by confusing taxiway F and east with each other on readback to ground control. Ground control exacerbated the confusion by non-standard terminology. Ground was referring to F5 as ramp 5 taxiway and F4 as ramp 4. This may be clear to aircrews who are very familiar with atlanta. Ground control was very quick in reading taxi instruction; and very quick in passive aggressive comments to several aircrews taxing out. This set a very hostile atmosphere between ground control and taxiing aircrews. Not good for CRM. Sometimes slow is fast on giving taxi instructions to aircrews and giving them time to respond and clarify. I should have refused to taxi until ground could take a deep breath and verify what he wanted us to do. Ground control needs to keep comments professional and concise. Lecturing aircrews during congested radio communications does no good for anyone.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air Carrier Flight crew reported a breakdown in communication during taxi out at ATL.
Narrative: Confusion on taxi clearance with Ground Control led to wrong execution of desired taxi instructions. F/O contributed by confusing Taxiway F and E with each other on readback to Ground Control. Ground Control exacerbated the confusion by non-standard terminology. Ground was referring to F5 as Ramp 5 Taxiway and F4 as Ramp 4. This may be clear to aircrews who are very familiar with Atlanta. Ground Control was very quick in reading taxi instruction; and very quick in passive aggressive comments to several aircrews taxing out. This set a very hostile atmosphere between Ground Control and taxiing aircrews. Not good for CRM. Sometimes slow is fast on giving taxi instructions to aircrews and giving them time to respond and clarify. I should have refused to taxi until Ground could take a deep breath and verify what he wanted us to do. Ground Control needs to keep comments professional and concise. Lecturing aircrews during congested radio communications does no good for anyone.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.