37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1406619 |
Time | |
Date | 201611 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | BOI.TRACON |
State Reference | ID |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Marginal |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | STAR BEWTE TWO |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
Arriving into boi from the north; we planned a visual approach that would be backed up by the RNAV X 28R. Upon check-in with ATC; we were told to expect clearance for the RNAV X. As we approached the IAF; however; ATC said that we would be following another carrier aircraft that was approximately four miles ahead of us on downwind. We advised that aircraft was in sight and we were cleared for a visual approach behind other carrier.seeing that spacing would be an issue if we were to remain on the RNAV track; I slowed the aircraft and went into heading mode to extend the downwind. Just as we started to turn base; we received a terrain caution. I disengaged the autopilot and autothrottles and initiated a climb. The alert ended; and we maneuvered to the south to remain clear.because we were hemmed in by terrain to the east and north and by the other carrier aircraft to our south; we probably should not have accepted the approach clearance. In retrospect; the better option may have been to request vectors for a straight in approach.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A flight crew cleared for the BOI Runway 28R visual was advised about downwind traffic and deviated north to gain space. The EGPWS 'CAUTION TERRAIN' alerted and the crew initiated an escape maneuver followed by an uneventful approach.
Narrative: Arriving into BOI from the north; we planned a visual approach that would be backed up by the RNAV X 28R. Upon check-in with ATC; we were told to expect clearance for the RNAV X. As we approached the IAF; however; ATC said that we would be following another carrier aircraft that was approximately four miles ahead of us on downwind. We advised that aircraft was in sight and we were cleared for a visual approach behind other carrier.Seeing that spacing would be an issue if we were to remain on the RNAV track; I slowed the aircraft and went into heading mode to extend the downwind. Just as we started to turn base; we received a Terrain Caution. I disengaged the autopilot and autothrottles and initiated a climb. The alert ended; and we maneuvered to the south to remain clear.Because we were hemmed in by terrain to the east and north and by the other carrier aircraft to our south; we probably should not have accepted the approach clearance. In retrospect; the better option may have been to request vectors for a straight in approach.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.