37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1457336 |
Time | |
Date | 201706 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER/LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Engine |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 225 Flight Crew Total 6500 Flight Crew Type 450 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Flight Deck / Cabin / Aircraft Event Smoke / Fire / Fumes / Odor |
Narrative:
I was the flying pilot. Ca was the pilot monitoring. Uneventful landing and transition from pilot monitoring to pilot flying at 80 knots. Between 80 knots and 60 knots the number 1 engine failed. Immediately after; there was a strong odor in the cockpit of something burning. Ca continued the landing rollout and exited the runway via the highspeed exit at taxiway delta and brought the aircraft to a stop at the intersection of delta and lima. We ran the QRH and let ATC know that we had an engine fail on landing. The flight attendant said that she also had an odor in the front of the cabin; but not in the rest of the cabin. She said the smell was only evident to her and possibly the passengers in the first 2 rows. Since we were unsure if we had an active fire; ca requested that the tower send the fire trucks to inspect the airplane. In case of a potential evacuation; ca elected to pull the airplane forward onto the open ramp area; so there would be access to the airplane from all sides. Ca made an announcement to the passengers. The fire trucks came and inspected the airplane and told us that there were no outward signs of fire or damage. We then proceeded to the gate and deplaned without incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EMB-145 flight crew reported the number one engine failed on landing rollout.
Narrative: I was the flying pilot. CA was the pilot monitoring. Uneventful landing and transition from pilot monitoring to pilot flying at 80 knots. Between 80 knots and 60 knots the Number 1 engine failed. Immediately after; there was a strong odor in the cockpit of something burning. CA continued the landing rollout and exited the runway via the highspeed exit at taxiway Delta and brought the aircraft to a stop at the intersection of Delta and Lima. We ran the QRH and let ATC know that we had an engine fail on landing. The FA said that she also had an odor in the front of the cabin; but not in the rest of the cabin. She said the smell was only evident to her and possibly the passengers in the first 2 rows. Since we were unsure if we had an active fire; CA requested that the tower send the fire trucks to inspect the airplane. In case of a potential evacuation; CA elected to pull the airplane forward onto the open ramp area; so there would be access to the airplane from all sides. CA made an announcement to the passengers. The fire trucks came and inspected the airplane and told us that there were no outward signs of fire or damage. We then proceeded to the gate and deplaned without incident.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.