37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 148216 |
Time | |
Date | 199006 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : cip |
State Reference | PA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 22000 msl bound upper : 22000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zob |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 20000 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 148216 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Air Traffic Incident | other other |
Narrative:
ATC issued a clearance which was complied with (heading 290 degrees) but was intended (apparently) for another aircraft with similar call sign. Then ATC refused to acknowledge my xmissions for approximately 5 mins while ATC tried to sort out confusion. ATC then issued new clrncs with an excuse of radio problem. However, there were no radio difficulties. It was so confused; corrective action is difficult to recommend.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: POSSIBLE TRACK OF HEADING DEVIATION FOR ACR MLG.
Narrative: ATC ISSUED A CLRNC WHICH WAS COMPLIED WITH (HDG 290 DEGS) BUT WAS INTENDED (APPARENTLY) FOR ANOTHER ACFT WITH SIMILAR CALL SIGN. THEN ATC REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE MY XMISSIONS FOR APPROX 5 MINS WHILE ATC TRIED TO SORT OUT CONFUSION. ATC THEN ISSUED NEW CLRNCS WITH AN EXCUSE OF RADIO PROB. HOWEVER, THERE WERE NO RADIO DIFFICULTIES. IT WAS SO CONFUSED; CORRECTIVE ACTION IS DIFFICULT TO RECOMMEND.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.