37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1485972 |
Time | |
Date | 201709 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SCT.TRACON |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Lancair Legacy |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 40 Flight Crew Total 2500 Flight Crew Type 700 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Socal approach is using outdated arrival procedures that are only obscurely published; failing to take advantage of modern equipment and databases; and thereby imposing unnecessary workload (and therefore hazard) on arriving aircrew. Furthermore; they are unable or unwilling to tell a pilot as little as 10 minutes before joining an instrument approach which approach will be used. Conversations with other pilots and personal experience from 10 years prior indicate that this is standard procedure for socal and has been brought to their attention previously.the arrival procedures in question turn out to be tower enroute control clearances; which are verbally dictated to the aircrew and sometimes changed midway through the arrival (although a STAR exists). The report also documents socal's clearance for a 110-degree turn onto final contrary to guidance in faah 7110.65 and without any prior warning to the pilot resulting in a serious overshoot of the final approach course.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Lancair pilot reported receiving an IFR clearance via VORs and airways when they were prepared to fly the published STAR. They were issued a VOR Approach which required a steep turn to the IAF which the pilot felt was in violation of ATC procedures.
Narrative: SoCal approach is using outdated arrival procedures that are only obscurely published; failing to take advantage of modern equipment and databases; and thereby imposing unnecessary workload (and therefore hazard) on arriving aircrew. Furthermore; they are unable or unwilling to tell a pilot as little as 10 minutes before joining an instrument approach which approach will be used. Conversations with other pilots and personal experience from 10 years prior indicate that this is standard procedure for SoCal and has been brought to their attention previously.The arrival procedures in question turn out to be Tower Enroute Control clearances; which are verbally dictated to the aircrew and sometimes changed midway through the arrival (although a STAR exists). The report also documents SoCal's clearance for a 110-degree turn onto final contrary to guidance in FAAH 7110.65 and without any prior warning to the pilot resulting in a serious overshoot of the final approach course.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.