SID departure ont missed crossing restriction pom VOR.

Attributes
ACN	155567
Time
Date	199008
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	atc facility : pom airport : ont
State Reference	CA
Altitude	msl bound lower : 8000 msl bound upper : 9900
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Dawn
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : ont tower : pia
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng
Navigation In Use	Other Other
Flight Phase	climbout : intermediate altitude
Route In Use	departure sid : sid enroute airway : ont
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 65 flight time total : 30000 flight time type : 5000
ASRS Report	155567
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 130 flight time total : 6500 flight time type : 800
ASRS Report	155568
Events
Anomaly	altitude deviation : crossing restriction not met altitude deviation : overshoot non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Early morning departure from ont (the 4TH day of a 4 day trip). Slept very poorly for last 2 nights. Received a xa:45 am local wakeup call with a scheduled xc:30 takeoff. Preflight, taxi, takeoff normal (scheduled departure with 92 passenger) on before start checklist is 'departure briefing'. The first officer and I talked about the pomona four departure, noting the climb restrictions. Our company just completely changed out checklists and moved the departure briefing from the final item back to the before start (6/thu/90). Experienced a flow control delay of approximately 20 min at the end of the runway. First officer, PF, I asked him if he was up to speed on the departure restrictions. He replied yes. Proceeded to takeoff and climbed through the pom 8000' restriction. ATC called us on it at approximately 2 miles southeast VOR going through 9900'. From the time we discussed the departure to implementing it was approximately 40 min. Cause: early morning, new checklist, tired, relied on first officer, head up ass. Supplemental information from acn 155568. First officer incorrectly presuming initial ATC climb clearance to 17000' from ground clearance was unrestricted. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following: participated in the boeing study. First officer made comment reference the rushed departure and the fact he was much less experienced than the captain and really needed more time to prepare. Captain assumed he was familiar and ready to go.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SID DEPARTURE ONT MISSED CROSSING RESTRICTION POM VOR.

Narrative: EARLY MORNING DEP FROM ONT (THE 4TH DAY OF A 4 DAY TRIP). SLEPT VERY POORLY FOR LAST 2 NIGHTS. RECEIVED A XA:45 AM LCL WAKEUP CALL WITH A SCHEDULED XC:30 TKOF. PREFLT, TAXI, TKOF NORMAL (SCHEDULED DEP WITH 92 PAX) ON BEFORE START CHKLIST IS 'DEP BRIEFING'. THE F/O AND I TALKED ABOUT THE POMONA FOUR DEP, NOTING THE CLB RESTRICTIONS. OUR COMPANY JUST COMPLETELY CHANGED OUT CHKLISTS AND MOVED THE DEP BRIEFING FROM THE FINAL ITEM BACK TO THE BEFORE START (6/THU/90). EXPERIENCED A FLOW CTL DELAY OF APPROX 20 MIN AT THE END OF THE RWY. F/O, PF, I ASKED HIM IF HE WAS UP TO SPD ON THE DEP RESTRICTIONS. HE REPLIED YES. PROCEEDED TO TKOF AND CLBED THROUGH THE POM 8000' RESTRICTION. ATC CALLED US ON IT AT APPROX 2 MILES SE VOR GOING THROUGH 9900'. FROM THE TIME WE DISCUSSED THE DEP TO IMPLEMENTING IT WAS APPROX 40 MIN. CAUSE: EARLY MORNING, NEW CHKLIST, TIRED, RELIED ON F/O, HEAD UP ASS. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM ACN 155568. F/O INCORRECTLY PRESUMING INITIAL ATC CLB CLRNC TO 17000' FROM GND CLRNC WAS UNRESTRICTED. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH REPORTER REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: PARTICIPATED IN THE BOEING STUDY. F/O MADE COMMENT REFERENCE THE RUSHED DEP AND THE FACT HE WAS MUCH LESS EXPERIENCED THAN THE CAPT AND REALLY NEEDED MORE TIME TO PREPARE. CAPT ASSUMED HE WAS FAMILIAR AND READY TO GO.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.