37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 155606 |
Time | |
Date | 199008 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : ffd |
State Reference | TX |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1600 msl bound upper : 1600 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | military facility : efd tracon : iah |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Military Trainer |
Flight Phase | other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller non radar : 2 controller radar : 3 |
ASRS Report | 155606 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : military |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : non radar pilot : military |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Deviation Inter Facility Coordination Failure |
Narrative:
I was the approach controller working traffic in and out of efd. Light transport was inbound to efd from the north. I called eft controller with the inbound and requested runway 22 which was not approved because of MTR in the traffic pattern to runway 4. I cleared light transport for a visibility approach to runway 4. I didn't switch him to tower because I was waiting for him to get below other traffic that was overflying. While I was waiting for the altitude, I got busy with other traffic and forgot to switch the light transport to efd. Light transport called when he was abeam efd and asked if he should switch to tower frequency. I said yes, to contact tower 126.2. The light transport and MTR got too close to each other. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following: reporter does not know how close the aircraft came together. He was in progress of briefing the relieving controller when the incident occurred. The relieving controller was the person who changed the frequency of the light transport when the tower controller asked to talk to the light transport. The MTR had been worked by the approach controller and changed to the tower. The MTR stayed in the traffic pattern making touch and go lndgs. The approach controller called the light transport to the tower before it entered the air traffic area. Tower did not inform the approach controller of any pertinent traffic.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: APCH CTLR FORGOT TO CHANGE FREQ ON THE LTT IN SUFFICIENT TIME SO THAT THE ATCT LCL CTLR COULD ISSUE TRAFFIC TO THE LTT FLT CREW. THE RESULT WAS THE LTT CAME VERY CLOSE TO THE MTR IN THE TRAFFIC PATTERN.
Narrative: I WAS THE APCH CTLR WORKING TFC IN AND OUT OF EFD. LTT WAS INBND TO EFD FROM THE N. I CALLED EFT CTLR WITH THE INBND AND REQUESTED RWY 22 WHICH WAS NOT APPROVED BECAUSE OF MTR IN THE TFC PATTERN TO RWY 4. I CLRED LTT FOR A VIS APCH TO RWY 4. I DIDN'T SWITCH HIM TO TWR BECAUSE I WAS WAITING FOR HIM TO GET BELOW OTHER TFC THAT WAS OVERFLYING. WHILE I WAS WAITING FOR THE ALT, I GOT BUSY WITH OTHER TFC AND FORGOT TO SWITCH THE LTT TO EFD. LTT CALLED WHEN HE WAS ABEAM EFD AND ASKED IF HE SHOULD SWITCH TO TWR FREQ. I SAID YES, TO CONTACT TWR 126.2. THE LTT AND MTR GOT TOO CLOSE TO EACH OTHER. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: RPTR DOES NOT KNOW HOW CLOSE THE ACFT CAME TOGETHER. HE WAS IN PROGRESS OF BRIEFING THE RELIEVING CTLR WHEN THE INCIDENT OCCURRED. THE RELIEVING CTLR WAS THE PERSON WHO CHANGED THE FREQ OF THE LTT WHEN THE TWR CTLR ASKED TO TALK TO THE LTT. THE MTR HAD BEEN WORKED BY THE APCH CTLR AND CHANGED TO THE TWR. THE MTR STAYED IN THE TFC PATTERN MAKING TOUCH AND GO LNDGS. THE APCH CTLR CALLED THE LTT TO THE TWR BEFORE IT ENTERED THE ATA. TWR DID NOT INFORM THE APCH CTLR OF ANY PERTINENT TFC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.