37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1589940 |
Time | |
Date | 201810 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Other All |
Route In Use | VFR Route |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Student |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 18 Flight Crew Total 18 Flight Crew Type 18 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Instructor |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor |
Experience | Flight Crew Total 370 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Ground Strike - Aircraft |
Narrative:
During the preflight inspection; for a solo flight at my flight school; I observed a half-inch bend on both ends of the propeller. While I was observing; I believed that the aircraft was still airworthy and that the damage would have little to no effect on the flight. I was properly trained by my CFI; that any damage of the prop should be reported; but I failed to comprehend that the prop damage could have resulted in a major failure. During the flight I felt the airplane vibrate more than usual and the performance was sluggish; but nothing to warrant an emergency landing or aborting a takeoff. Because of the negligible effect that the damaged prop had on the airplane; to me it confirmed that nothing was wrong; which in hindsight I realize it was not a good decision. With this situation; I should have asked any other person; and my instructor whether or not the aircraft is airworthy due to the prop damage. In the future; I will report any minor or major problems with the aircraft to flight operations as a preventative measure. I feel that inexperience contributed to me making this decision. I will also be conducting post flight inspections more thoroughly after every flight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 flight instructors and a student pilot reported the student flew an aircraft with known prop damage.
Narrative: During the preflight inspection; for a solo flight at my flight school; I observed a half-inch bend on both ends of the propeller. While I was observing; I believed that the aircraft was still airworthy and that the damage would have little to no effect on the flight. I was properly trained by my CFI; that any damage of the prop should be reported; but I failed to comprehend that the prop damage could have resulted in a major failure. During the flight I felt the airplane vibrate more than usual and the performance was sluggish; but nothing to warrant an emergency landing or aborting a takeoff. Because of the negligible effect that the damaged prop had on the airplane; to me it confirmed that nothing was wrong; which in hindsight I realize it was not a good decision. With this situation; I should have asked any other person; and my instructor whether or not the aircraft is airworthy due to the prop damage. In the future; I will report ANY minor or major problems with the aircraft to flight operations as a preventative measure. I feel that inexperience contributed to me making this decision. I will also be conducting post flight inspections more thoroughly after every flight.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.