37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 160500 |
Time | |
Date | 199010 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : atl |
State Reference | GA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : atl tracon : pvd |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 202 flight time total : 18486 flight time type : 12000 |
ASRS Report | 160500 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 220 flight time total : 4400 flight time type : 2200 |
ASRS Report | 160496 |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Arriving in the atl area, approach control asked us about 22 NM out if we had the runway. After we said yes, they cleared us for the approach, told us we were #1, and to contact tower over the marker. After landing and waiting to be cleared across the parallel runway, I looked down and saw that we were still on approach control frequency. I then had the frequency changed to tower and they cleared us across. This might not have happened if we had double-checked our landing clearance. Supplemental information from acn 160496: external factors that contributed to this situation were arriving at a busy airport that was not busy (i.e., approach control handled us and that was it. No other radio traffic triggered our minds that we were on approach control). Other factors were good VMC at a non peak time.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR MLG LANDS WITHOUT CLRNC AT ATL.
Narrative: ARRIVING IN THE ATL AREA, APCH CTL ASKED US ABOUT 22 NM OUT IF WE HAD THE RWY. AFTER WE SAID YES, THEY CLRED US FOR THE APCH, TOLD US WE WERE #1, AND TO CONTACT TWR OVER THE MARKER. AFTER LNDG AND WAITING TO BE CLRED ACROSS THE PARALLEL RWY, I LOOKED DOWN AND SAW THAT WE WERE STILL ON APCH CTL FREQ. I THEN HAD THE FREQ CHANGED TO TWR AND THEY CLRED US ACROSS. THIS MIGHT NOT HAVE HAPPENED IF WE HAD DOUBLE-CHKED OUR LNDG CLRNC. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 160496: EXTERNAL FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THIS SITUATION WERE ARRIVING AT A BUSY ARPT THAT WAS NOT BUSY (I.E., APCH CTL HANDLED US AND THAT WAS IT. NO OTHER RADIO TFC TRIGGERED OUR MINDS THAT WE WERE ON APCH CTL). OTHER FACTORS WERE GOOD VMC AT A NON PEAK TIME.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.