37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 161365 |
Time | |
Date | 199010 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : rdu |
State Reference | NC |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2000 msl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : rdu tower : rdu tower : cmh |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 8 flight time total : 450 flight time type : 450 |
ASRS Report | 161365 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : departure |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance non adherence : required legal separation other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I discovered the problem when I was asked to call the tower when I landed. The controller told me that I had not flown the assigned heading of 115 degrees after takeoff from runway 5. I believe that I verified 115 degrees when assigned on the runway. I remember feeling hurried. I must have placed my directional gyro bug on '15.' after takeoff I turned right toward the heading bug. I noticed that I was a few degrees south of the bug about the same time that the controller told me to turn left to 115 degrees. I felt I had done that by turning back to the bug heading. After my initial mistake of placing the bug on 15 instead of 115, my mind could not discover that I was completely on the wrong heading. The controller told me that I had interrupted sep practices. There was an inbound aircraft to runway 32 that I saw well below me. Possible changes that could help or contributing factors: I have just returned to flying after 1 yr off. I felt somewhat rusty, even though legal. Maybe a heading bug is not a good ideal. It may make a pilot fix on the bug or not easily allow discovery of an error. I did not hear in the controller's voice that there was a major problem. The controller could have told me to turn 30 degrees left and regardless of the heading I thought I should fly, that would have eliminated the traffic conflict. I was also having communication problems with poor headset--vol on high gain. I was changing to cabin speaker at that time. 2 persons told me that I looked like I felt bad that day. I did not feel bad, but did feel tired. At rdu departure heading was assigned with clearance delivery. This would give a chance to write down departure heading and take time setting heading bug. I was given the heading while on the runway in a congested phase of flight. I do not like this new system because writing while preparing for takeoff on runway 5 is difficult--little opportunity to double-check what I was doing.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT DEPARTS ON IFR FLT, MISSETS HEADING BUG, FLIES WRONG HEADING AND CAUSES LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION.
Narrative: I DISCOVERED THE PROB WHEN I WAS ASKED TO CALL THE TWR WHEN I LANDED. THE CTLR TOLD ME THAT I HAD NOT FLOWN THE ASSIGNED HDG OF 115 DEGS AFTER TKOF FROM RWY 5. I BELIEVE THAT I VERIFIED 115 DEGS WHEN ASSIGNED ON THE RWY. I REMEMBER FEELING HURRIED. I MUST HAVE PLACED MY DIRECTIONAL GYRO BUG ON '15.' AFTER TKOF I TURNED RIGHT TOWARD THE HDG BUG. I NOTICED THAT I WAS A FEW DEGS S OF THE BUG ABOUT THE SAME TIME THAT THE CTLR TOLD ME TO TURN LEFT TO 115 DEGS. I FELT I HAD DONE THAT BY TURNING BACK TO THE BUG HDG. AFTER MY INITIAL MISTAKE OF PLACING THE BUG ON 15 INSTEAD OF 115, MY MIND COULD NOT DISCOVER THAT I WAS COMPLETELY ON THE WRONG HDG. THE CTLR TOLD ME THAT I HAD INTERRUPTED SEP PRACTICES. THERE WAS AN INBND ACFT TO RWY 32 THAT I SAW WELL BELOW ME. POSSIBLE CHANGES THAT COULD HELP OR CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: I HAVE JUST RETURNED TO FLYING AFTER 1 YR OFF. I FELT SOMEWHAT RUSTY, EVEN THOUGH LEGAL. MAYBE A HDG BUG IS NOT A GOOD IDEAL. IT MAY MAKE A PLT FIX ON THE BUG OR NOT EASILY ALLOW DISCOVERY OF AN ERROR. I DID NOT HEAR IN THE CTLR'S VOICE THAT THERE WAS A MAJOR PROB. THE CTLR COULD HAVE TOLD ME TO TURN 30 DEGS LEFT AND REGARDLESS OF THE HDG I THOUGHT I SHOULD FLY, THAT WOULD HAVE ELIMINATED THE TFC CONFLICT. I WAS ALSO HAVING COM PROBS WITH POOR HEADSET--VOL ON HIGH GAIN. I WAS CHANGING TO CABIN SPEAKER AT THAT TIME. 2 PERSONS TOLD ME THAT I LOOKED LIKE I FELT BAD THAT DAY. I DID NOT FEEL BAD, BUT DID FEEL TIRED. AT RDU DEP HDG WAS ASSIGNED WITH CLRNC DELIVERY. THIS WOULD GIVE A CHANCE TO WRITE DOWN DEP HDG AND TAKE TIME SETTING HDG BUG. I WAS GIVEN THE HDG WHILE ON THE RWY IN A CONGESTED PHASE OF FLT. I DO NOT LIKE THIS NEW SYS BECAUSE WRITING WHILE PREPARING FOR TKOF ON RWY 5 IS DIFFICULT--LITTLE OPPORTUNITY TO DOUBLE-CHK WHAT I WAS DOING.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.