Narrative:

Pack 2 deferred was inoperative. After number 2 engine start we did a status check and noticed pack 2 inop which was expected. Below this was ap 2 inop. Expectation bias and fatigue caused failure to realize that ap 2 inop was not related to pack 2 inop. Continued normal taxi and takeoff without ap 2 inop maintenance logbook entry. Wrote up entry during cruise. [Maintenance control] communicated that this was an FMGC 2 failure after second engine start. Fatigue was an issue here.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A320 flight crew reported not documenting an aircraft equipment problem in the maintenance log.

Narrative: Pack 2 deferred was inoperative. After number 2 engine start we did a status check and noticed pack 2 inop which was expected. Below this was AP 2 inop. Expectation bias and fatigue caused failure to realize that AP 2 inop was not related to Pack 2 inop. Continued normal taxi and takeoff without AP 2 inop maintenance logbook entry. Wrote up entry during cruise. [Maintenance Control] communicated that this was an FMGC 2 failure after second engine start. Fatigue was an issue here.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.