Narrative:

After takeoff from efd, a normal climb to cruise altitude of FL410 was completed. Sometime after passing lufkin VOR en route to shreveport VOR, both the captain and first officer got navigation warning flags in each HSI. A vector to lit (next fix en route) was requested from ATC while the problem was being troubleshooted. After troubleshooting was finished, to no avail, company dispatch was notified to request VFR alternates and a new dispatch release to our new destination. A clearance was requested and received from ATC for our new destination, elp. After being established on the new heading for a short period of time, the winds were determined to be stronger than expected. ATC was informed that we would be marginal on fuel for elp and closer airport was needed. ATC suggested we use oklahoma city, ok, whose WX had just been revised and was showing a ceiling above our nonprecision minimums. We were given vectors to okc and after shooting a non precision radar approach, an uneventful landing was made. The problem was located at a t-junction of the cable from the antenna to the receivers for the VHF navigation radios. I do not know what could be done by flight crew or maintenance to prevent this from happening again. Note: ceilings at destination (sdf) and alternate were fine for ILS approachs, but were barely useful for non precision approachs. This was true for every alternate airport we had fuel to get to, after an approach and miss at our destination.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLT CREW OF HVT CARGO LOST BOTH HSI INSTRUMENTS, WARNING FLAG, ELECTED TO PROCEED TO AN ALTERNATE WITH VFR WX TO AVOID HAVING TO MAKE AN NDB APCH TO MINIMUMS AT THEIR SCHEDULED DESTINATION.

Narrative: AFTER TKOF FROM EFD, A NORMAL CLB TO CRUISE ALT OF FL410 WAS COMPLETED. SOMETIME AFTER PASSING LUFKIN VOR ENRTE TO SHREVEPORT VOR, BOTH THE CAPT AND F/O GOT NAV WARNING FLAGS IN EACH HSI. A VECTOR TO LIT (NEXT FIX ENRTE) WAS REQUESTED FROM ATC WHILE THE PROB WAS BEING TROUBLESHOOTED. AFTER TROUBLESHOOTING WAS FINISHED, TO NO AVAIL, COMPANY DISPATCH WAS NOTIFIED TO REQUEST VFR ALTERNATES AND A NEW DISPATCH RELEASE TO OUR NEW DEST. A CLRNC WAS REQUESTED AND RECEIVED FROM ATC FOR OUR NEW DEST, ELP. AFTER BEING ESTABLISHED ON THE NEW HDG FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, THE WINDS WERE DETERMINED TO BE STRONGER THAN EXPECTED. ATC WAS INFORMED THAT WE WOULD BE MARGINAL ON FUEL FOR ELP AND CLOSER ARPT WAS NEEDED. ATC SUGGESTED WE USE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, WHOSE WX HAD JUST BEEN REVISED AND WAS SHOWING A CEILING ABOVE OUR NONPRECISION MINIMUMS. WE WERE GIVEN VECTORS TO OKC AND AFTER SHOOTING A NON PRECISION RADAR APCH, AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG WAS MADE. THE PROB WAS LOCATED AT A T-JUNCTION OF THE CABLE FROM THE ANTENNA TO THE RECEIVERS FOR THE VHF NAV RADIOS. I DO NOT KNOW WHAT COULD BE DONE BY FLT CREW OR MAINT TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING AGAIN. NOTE: CEILINGS AT DEST (SDF) AND ALTERNATE WERE FINE FOR ILS APCHS, BUT WERE BARELY USEFUL FOR NON PRECISION APCHS. THIS WAS TRUE FOR EVERY ALTERNATE ARPT WE HAD FUEL TO GET TO, AFTER AN APCH AND MISS AT OUR DEST.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.