37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 167498 |
Time | |
Date | 199101 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : fwa |
State Reference | IN |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 15000 msl bound upper : 20000 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zid artcc : zau |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | enroute : direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
ASRS Report | 167498 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : developmental |
ASRS Report | 167643 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 18000 vertical : 400 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Inter Facility Coordination Failure Operational Error |
Narrative:
Air carrier X was sebnd toward rod, descending from FL230 to 15000'. Air carrier Y was passenger direct fwa climbing to FL200. I recognized the conflict and when my trnee didn't take the proper action, I issued vectors to air carrier Y and told ZAU to issue a 060 degree heading to air carrier X. ZAU misunderstood my request and never issued the 060 degree heading. Air carrier Y was told 'far traffic, turn left heading 270 degrees, tight turn for traffic.' 40 seconds after the clearance was issued, the aircraft's track had changed 2 degrees. Supplemental information from acn 167643: air carrier Y nwbnd from dqn direction fwa climbing to FL200. Air carrier X sebnd rod direct rod descending from FL230 to 15000'. I was radar training and recognized the conflict and called ZAU to stop air carrier X and try to use vertical sep. At this time instrument intervened and issued a vector to ZAU for air carrier X. Instrument then issued a vector to air carrier Y.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR X HAD LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION FROM ACR Y. SYSTEM ERROR.
Narrative: ACR X WAS SEBND TOWARD ROD, DSNDING FROM FL230 TO 15000'. ACR Y WAS PAX DIRECT FWA CLBING TO FL200. I RECOGNIZED THE CONFLICT AND WHEN MY TRNEE DIDN'T TAKE THE PROPER ACTION, I ISSUED VECTORS TO ACR Y AND TOLD ZAU TO ISSUE A 060 DEG HDG TO ACR X. ZAU MISUNDERSTOOD MY REQUEST AND NEVER ISSUED THE 060 DEG HDG. ACR Y WAS TOLD 'FAR TFC, TURN LEFT HDG 270 DEGS, TIGHT TURN FOR TFC.' 40 SECS AFTER THE CLRNC WAS ISSUED, THE ACFT'S TRACK HAD CHANGED 2 DEGS. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 167643: ACR Y NWBND FROM DQN DIRECTION FWA CLBING TO FL200. ACR X SEBND ROD DIRECT ROD DSNDING FROM FL230 TO 15000'. I WAS RADAR TRNING AND RECOGNIZED THE CONFLICT AND CALLED ZAU TO STOP ACR X AND TRY TO USE VERT SEP. AT THIS TIME INSTR INTERVENED AND ISSUED A VECTOR TO ZAU FOR ACR X. INSTR THEN ISSUED A VECTOR TO ACR Y.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.