Pilot of small aircraft twin changed his mind regarding a touch and go and attempted to stop on runw...

Attributes
ACN	173559
Time
Date	199103
Day	Sat
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : crq
State Reference	CA
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 2 Eng, Retractable Gear
Flight Phase	landing other other
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 85 flight time total : 1550 flight time type : 60
ASRS Report	173559
Person 2
Affiliation	government : faa
Function	controller : local
Qualification	controller : non radar
Events
Anomaly	other anomaly other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other other : unspecified cockpit
Resolutory Action	none taken : anomaly accepted
Consequence	other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Day VFR with a 4000' broken layer. I was working the touch and go traffic pattern at mcclellan airport and was advised by tower to follow a jet. I was concerned with wake turbulence, so I made my approach to T/D on the second half of the runway. I then decided to go around after thinking about the wake turbulence and advised tower. They said I was cleared for a touch and go. I reevaluated and determined I had sufficient runway to do this (the first link in the chain). After T/D, I added power for a split second and realized I would not be able to make a safe takeoff, so I went to maximum aerodynamic braking, followed by hard braking. The braking action of the aircraft was poor, in my opinion (it was a club aircraft). I tried to make the last taxiway, but felt I would FLIP the aircraft or blow a tire if I tried to make it (carrying excessive speed). I then settled for going straight ahead to avoid the REIL's. The aircraft's mixtures were secured as we settled in the muddy ground about 15' from the tarmac. Propellers were damaged by impacting mud.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT OF SMA TWIN CHANGED HIS MIND REGARDING A TOUCH AND GO AND ATTEMPTED TO STOP ON RWY AFTER LNDG LONG WITH EXCESS SPEED. EXCURSIONED OFF END INTO SOFT GND. PROPELLER DAMAGE.

Narrative: DAY VFR WITH A 4000' BROKEN LAYER. I WAS WORKING THE TOUCH AND GO TFC PATTERN AT MCCLELLAN ARPT AND WAS ADVISED BY TWR TO FOLLOW A JET. I WAS CONCERNED WITH WAKE TURB, SO I MADE MY APCH TO T/D ON THE SECOND HALF OF THE RWY. I THEN DECIDED TO GO AROUND AFTER THINKING ABOUT THE WAKE TURB AND ADVISED TWR. THEY SAID I WAS CLRED FOR A TOUCH AND GO. I REEVALUATED AND DETERMINED I HAD SUFFICIENT RWY TO DO THIS (THE FIRST LINK IN THE CHAIN). AFTER T/D, I ADDED PWR FOR A SPLIT SECOND AND REALIZED I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE A SAFE TKOF, SO I WENT TO MAX AERODYNAMIC BRAKING, FOLLOWED BY HARD BRAKING. THE BRAKING ACTION OF THE ACFT WAS POOR, IN MY OPINION (IT WAS A CLUB ACFT). I TRIED TO MAKE THE LAST TXWY, BUT FELT I WOULD FLIP THE ACFT OR BLOW A TIRE IF I TRIED TO MAKE IT (CARRYING EXCESSIVE SPD). I THEN SETTLED FOR GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD TO AVOID THE REIL'S. THE ACFT'S MIXTURES WERE SECURED AS WE SETTLED IN THE MUDDY GND ABOUT 15' FROM THE TARMAC. PROPS WERE DAMAGED BY IMPACTING MUD.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Pilot of small aircraft twin changed his mind regarding a touch and go and attempted to stop on runway after landing long with excess speed. Excursioned off end into soft ground. Propeller damage.