Narrative:

On approach, flying right downwind for runway 27R in and out of clouds with thunderstorms in area, we were informed by mia approach we would fly the 27R approach. Approximately 14 DME from the field, we were turned to base leg and descended to 3000'. We were told now to expect an approach to 27L and we set the ILS to 27L. Several mi south of 27L centerline, we were told to head 290 degrees and intercept 27L cleared for approach. About 12 mi from the airport we intercepted and followed the 27L course. We broke out into the clear near 11 DME, lined up to 27L. Approach called us and asked if we were maintaining a 290 degree heading to intercept 27R! We switched navaids again to 27R, intercepted ILS 27R to a normal approach and landing. There was no conflict of any traffic. This was the second time in 1 1/2 yrs that mia approach control has cleared us to different runways.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: RWY CONFUSION FOR ACR LGT ON VECTORS FOR APCH AT MIA.

Narrative: ON APCH, FLYING RIGHT DOWNWIND FOR RWY 27R IN AND OUT OF CLOUDS WITH TSTMS IN AREA, WE WERE INFORMED BY MIA APCH WE WOULD FLY THE 27R APCH. APPROX 14 DME FROM THE FIELD, WE WERE TURNED TO BASE LEG AND DSNDED TO 3000'. WE WERE TOLD NOW TO EXPECT AN APCH TO 27L AND WE SET THE ILS TO 27L. SEVERAL MI S OF 27L CENTERLINE, WE WERE TOLD TO HEAD 290 DEGS AND INTERCEPT 27L CLRED FOR APCH. ABOUT 12 MI FROM THE ARPT WE INTERCEPTED AND FOLLOWED THE 27L COURSE. WE BROKE OUT INTO THE CLR NEAR 11 DME, LINED UP TO 27L. APCH CALLED US AND ASKED IF WE WERE MAINTAINING A 290 DEG HDG TO INTERCEPT 27R! WE SWITCHED NAVAIDS AGAIN TO 27R, INTERCEPTED ILS 27R TO A NORMAL APCH AND LNDG. THERE WAS NO CONFLICT OF ANY TFC. THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME IN 1 1/2 YRS THAT MIA APCH CTL HAS CLRED US TO DIFFERENT RWYS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.