Narrative:

I was the first officer operating aircraft X from ZZZ to ZZZ1. I reported for duty on time after a restful overnight stay at the hotel. Preflight planning was unremarkable. After completing normal preflight; briefings; checklists; pushback; engine start; and taxi; we were cleared for takeoff in ZZZ on runway xxr. Captain was the PF and advanced engine power smoothly as he called 'check thrust.' thrust was normal. The yellow master caution illuminated engine and I looked up to the overhead for further details finding the eec's were in altn mode. At that point the autothrottles disconnected. As I looked down to my pfd I noted my airspeed was still resting at 45 kts and announced to captain that my airspeed was dead.captain made the decision to reject the takeoff. I notified the tower we were rejecting the takeoff on runway xxr. As we slowed I made the remain seated announcement to the cabin. We cleared the runway at [taxiway] xy and completed the rejected takeoff checklist. There was no need to evacuate and normal after landing flows were completed.we requested taxi back to the gate and consulted the brake cooling charts. The reject occurred at approximately 120 kts and a gross weight of 154.2 placing us in the cautionary zone for fuse plug melting. ZZZ operations was contacted for return gate assignment (gate xx) and we advised them of the safety hazard for hot brakes and potential fuse plug melting. After parking at the gate and accomplishing normal shutdown flows and checklists; we notified dispatch we had rtbl due to a rejected takeoff and were back at the gate. We submitted two entries for 1. Rejected takeoff and 2. First officer airspeed/engine eec lights. Crew and flight attendant debriefings were conducted. Tech operations met us and discussed the details of the rejected takeoff. We learned the aircraft had come from the hanger and had not been flown in a while. They were unsure if the aircraft was 'extra' or '[one that had been sitting for a while]' but they commented that the pitot static systems had been a source of problems as aircraft were brought back to revenue service.flight operations contacted us to determine fitness for continued duty followed by asst chief pilot approving continued flight. A new aircraft was assigned and we completed the flight to ZZZ1 uneventfully.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Air carrier First Officer reported a rejected takeoff after the master caution illuminated and subsequently noticing a non functional airspeed indication on the First Officer's Primary Flight Display.

Narrative: I was the First Officer operating Aircraft X from ZZZ to ZZZ1. I reported for duty on time after a restful overnight stay at the hotel. Preflight planning was unremarkable. After completing normal preflight; briefings; checklists; pushback; engine start; and taxi; we were cleared for takeoff in ZZZ on Runway XXR. Captain was the PF and advanced engine power smoothly as he called 'check thrust.' Thrust was normal. The yellow master caution illuminated ENG and I looked up to the overhead for further details finding the EEC's were in ALTN mode. At that point the autothrottles disconnected. As I looked down to my PFD I noted my airspeed was still resting at 45 kts and announced to Captain that my airspeed was dead.Captain made the decision to reject the takeoff. I notified the Tower we were rejecting the takeoff on Runway XXR. As we slowed I made the remain seated announcement to the cabin. We cleared the runway at [Taxiway] XY and completed the rejected takeoff checklist. There was no need to evacuate and normal after landing flows were completed.We requested taxi back to the gate and consulted the brake cooling charts. The reject occurred at approximately 120 kts and a gross weight of 154.2 placing us in the cautionary zone for fuse plug melting. ZZZ operations was contacted for return gate assignment (gate XX) and we advised them of the safety hazard for hot brakes and potential fuse plug melting. After parking at the gate and accomplishing normal shutdown flows and checklists; we notified Dispatch we had RTBL due to a rejected takeoff and were back at the gate. We submitted two entries for 1. rejected takeoff and 2. FO airspeed/engine EEC lights. Crew and flight attendant debriefings were conducted. Tech Operations met us and discussed the details of the rejected takeoff. We learned the aircraft had come from the hanger and had not been flown in a while. They were unsure if the aircraft was 'extra' or '[one that had been sitting for a while]' but they commented that the pitot static systems had been a source of problems as aircraft were brought back to revenue service.Flight operations contacted us to determine fitness for continued duty followed by Asst Chief Pilot approving continued flight. A new aircraft was assigned and we completed the flight to ZZZ1 uneventfully.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.