37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1766439 |
Time | |
Date | 202010 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 50 Flight Crew Type 8800 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
On arrival into ZZZ; descending via on the ZZZZZ3 arrival just before the zzzzz waypoint; we checked on with approach; and they responded 'company XXXX; cleared ILS X.' I had programmed the ILS X for our arrival; but didn't select any transition on the approach. The ZZZZZ3 STAR has the note to cross zzzzz at 6;000 feet; expect ILS or localizer runway X. On receipt of the clearance; I paused for a moment as there was a discontinuity in the box after zzzzz and before ZZZZZ1 [waypoint]; and the remaining points on the ILS X. ATC had not given us a heading or guidance for after the last fix on the STAR; just cleared ILS X. I looked at my efb to see what the text of the STAR said; and my captain seeing my confusion; said 'you're cleared for approach; how about direct ZZZZZ1?' he had also queued up ZZZZZ1 in the box; and was poised to execute it. I still wasn't sure; but he seemed positive. I said 'ok;' he executed it and we began direct to ZZZZZ1. Within a few seconds; approach queried us 'I show you left of course; what [are you] doing?' the captain replied; 'we're direct ZZZZZ1 cleared for ILS X; is there something else you would like?' ATC responded that there was a zzzzz transition to the ILS X; and in future that is what he meant when he cleared us ILS X - to fly the zzzzz transition on the ILS from the STAR. Had I looked closer at the approach plate; and not just the STAR chart; after the issuance of the clearance; the ATC clearance intention would've become obvious to me. I let my captain cause me to second guess my hesitation; and disregard my uncertainty over our clearance. I should have requested he ask for clarification from ATC instead of allowing him to execute a path I was unsure of. I have felt a bit slow in the cockpit lately; due to having flown very infrequent this year (light schedules/hindsight/scheduled time off) and I believe I made the false assumption I was missing something and he was correct. A simple query to ATC would have cleared up the matter.I should have taken a moment longer to review the appropriate charts to clarify the appropriate flight course; and failing that answering my question; I should have queried ATC for clarification. When programming the approach; closer examination of the plate would have shown the available lead in transition from zzzzz. I should have trusted my hesitation upon receipt of the clearance and not assumed I was wrong in needing clarification.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air Carrier First Officer reported a track deviation after missing a transition waypoint during an ILS arrival.
Narrative: On arrival into ZZZ; descending via on the ZZZZZ3 Arrival just before the ZZZZZ waypoint; we checked on with approach; and they responded 'Company XXXX; cleared ILS X.' I had programmed the ILS X for our arrival; but didn't select any transition on the approach. The ZZZZZ3 STAR has the note to cross ZZZZZ at 6;000 feet; expect ILS or LOC Runway X. On receipt of the clearance; I paused for a moment as there was a discontinuity in the box after ZZZZZ and before ZZZZZ1 [waypoint]; and the remaining points on the ILS X. ATC had not given us a heading or guidance for after the last fix on the STAR; just cleared ILS X. I looked at my EFB to see what the text of the STAR said; and my Captain seeing my confusion; said 'you're cleared for approach; how about direct ZZZZZ1?' He had also queued up ZZZZZ1 in the box; and was poised to execute it. I still wasn't sure; but he seemed positive. I said 'OK;' he executed it and we began direct to ZZZZZ1. Within a few seconds; Approach queried us 'I show you left of course; what [are you] doing?' The Captain replied; 'we're direct ZZZZZ1 cleared for ILS X; is there something else you would like?' ATC responded that there was a ZZZZZ transition to the ILS X; and in future that is what he meant when he cleared us ILS X - to fly the ZZZZZ transition on the ILS from the STAR. Had I looked closer at the approach plate; and not just the STAR chart; after the issuance of the clearance; the ATC clearance intention would've become obvious to me. I let my Captain cause me to second guess my hesitation; and disregard my uncertainty over our clearance. I should have requested he ask for clarification from ATC instead of allowing him to execute a path I was unsure of. I have felt a bit slow in the cockpit lately; due to having flown very infrequent this year (light schedules/hindsight/scheduled time off) and I believe I made the false assumption I was missing something and he was correct. A simple query to ATC would have cleared up the matter.I should have taken a moment longer to review the appropriate charts to clarify the appropriate flight course; and failing that answering my question; I should have queried ATC for clarification. When programming the approach; closer examination of the plate would have shown the available lead in transition from ZZZZZ. I should have trusted my hesitation upon receipt of the clearance and not assumed I was wrong in needing clarification.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.