37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 183875 |
Time | |
Date | 199107 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : hkg |
State Reference | FO |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1100 msl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : hkg |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 4 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other landing other |
Route In Use | arrival other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : atp pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 225 flight time total : 18000 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 183875 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : overshoot non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | other other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
It's the old altimeter story again! A 13 hour flight, fair rest during night. Typhoon in area, good arrival WX. However, low pressure. ATIS gave altimeter setting of 994. Upon changing to approach control, they also gave us 994 qnh. I was flying, and set 29-94 hg in the altimeter instead of hecto pascals of 994. There was not enough conflict resolution in the cockpit to be sure we set 994 not 29.94. I wanted to hear '2'9.94. We tend to get sloppy stateside. Elimination of the first digit, and we are not used to hearing a low hecto setting. We could see the runway 31 at hrg but instead of 2000 ft above ground at OM intercept, we were 900 ft low! The tower controller did call it, and we finally corrected the altimeter and landed uneventfully. Worldwide standardization would help!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: INTERNATIONAL OP. ALTIMETER GIVEN IN HECTO PASCALS 994 FLC SET 29 PT 94 HG. WERE 900 FT LOW OVER THE OM.
Narrative: IT'S THE OLD ALTIMETER STORY AGAIN! A 13 HR FLT, FAIR REST DURING NIGHT. TYPHOON IN AREA, GOOD ARR WX. HOWEVER, LOW PRESSURE. ATIS GAVE ALTIMETER SETTING OF 994. UPON CHANGING TO APCH CTL, THEY ALSO GAVE US 994 QNH. I WAS FLYING, AND SET 29-94 HG IN THE ALTIMETER INSTEAD OF HECTO PASCALS OF 994. THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN THE COCKPIT TO BE SURE WE SET 994 NOT 29.94. I WANTED TO HEAR '2'9.94. WE TEND TO GET SLOPPY STATESIDE. ELIMINATION OF THE FIRST DIGIT, AND WE ARE NOT USED TO HEARING A LOW HECTO SETTING. WE COULD SEE THE RWY 31 AT HRG BUT INSTEAD OF 2000 FT ABOVE GND AT OM INTERCEPT, WE WERE 900 FT LOW! THE TWR CTLR DID CALL IT, AND WE FINALLY CORRECTED THE ALTIMETER AND LANDED UNEVENTFULLY. WORLDWIDE STANDARDIZATION WOULD HELP!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.