Narrative:

I was teaching a student recoveries from unusual flight attitudes when during a steep pullup I realized the aircraft whose landing light I had seen a min before was much closer than I had thought. I rolled away from the other aircraft, and as I did so saw the other aircraft start into a left turn to avoid me. More careful observation on my part would have avoided the situation, but I also feel the 'lights on' policy of the FAA may have contributed to it. An airplane with navigation lights and beacon is easy to see at night, and because of the separation between the lights it's also easy to tell how far away it is and the rate of closure. When the landing light is on as well, it so dominates the other lights as to make them indistinguishable until it may be too late. It's just about impossible to judge distance from a single light source.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: INSTRUCTOR WITH SPI HAS NMAC WITH SECOND ACFT.

Narrative: I WAS TEACHING A STUDENT RECOVERIES FROM UNUSUAL FLT ATTITUDES WHEN DURING A STEEP PULLUP I REALIZED THE ACFT WHOSE LNDG LIGHT I HAD SEEN A MIN BEFORE WAS MUCH CLOSER THAN I HAD THOUGHT. I ROLLED AWAY FROM THE OTHER ACFT, AND AS I DID SO SAW THE OTHER ACFT START INTO A L TURN TO AVOID ME. MORE CAREFUL OBSERVATION ON MY PART WOULD HAVE AVOIDED THE SITUATION, BUT I ALSO FEEL THE 'LIGHTS ON' POLICY OF THE FAA MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO IT. AN AIRPLANE WITH NAV LIGHTS AND BEACON IS EASY TO SEE AT NIGHT, AND BECAUSE OF THE SEPARATION BTWN THE LIGHTS IT'S ALSO EASY TO TELL HOW FAR AWAY IT IS AND THE RATE OF CLOSURE. WHEN THE LNDG LIGHT IS ON AS WELL, IT SO DOMINATES THE OTHER LIGHTS AS TO MAKE THEM INDISTINGUISHABLE UNTIL IT MAY BE TOO LATE. IT'S JUST ABOUT IMPOSSIBLE TO JUDGE DISTANCE FROM A SINGLE LIGHT SOURCE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.