37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 196779 |
Time | |
Date | 199112 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : dfw |
State Reference | TX |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : ord |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | ground : holding ground other : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 10800 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 196779 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : ground |
Qualification | controller : non radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Airport |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : unspecified |
Airport | procedure or policy : unspecified |
Narrative:
I used to fly for a commuter in atl. In atl, airport rules state that 'all aircraft shall readback all runway holding instructions including aircraft identify.' this rule is a great safety device for airports with parallel runways, and it is printed on the atl airport diagram and spoken on the arrival and departure ATIS. I now fly for a commuter in dfw and although their taxi procedures are much more complex there is no requirement to readback all runway holding instructions. Why? Runway incursions are the #2 violation in the USA behind altitude busts, and with their parallel runway operation and super complex taxiway layout they should have a rule making runway holding readbacks mandatory. I do it anyway but it should be a rule.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: RPTR SUGGESTS ALL ARPTS OPERATING PARALLEL RWYS HAVE ARPT REQUIREMENT THAT ALL RWY HOLD INSTRUCTIONS BE READ BACK WITH FULL IDENT OF ACFT AND RWY.
Narrative: I USED TO FLY FOR A COMMUTER IN ATL. IN ATL, ARPT RULES STATE THAT 'ALL ACFT SHALL READBACK ALL RWY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING ACFT IDENT.' THIS RULE IS A GREAT SAFETY DEVICE FOR ARPTS WITH PARALLEL RWYS, AND IT IS PRINTED ON THE ATL ARPT DIAGRAM AND SPOKEN ON THE ARR AND DEP ATIS. I NOW FLY FOR A COMMUTER IN DFW AND ALTHOUGH THEIR TAXI PROCS ARE MUCH MORE COMPLEX THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO READBACK ALL RWY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS. WHY? RWY INCURSIONS ARE THE #2 VIOLATION IN THE USA BEHIND ALT BUSTS, AND WITH THEIR PARALLEL RWY OP AND SUPER COMPLEX TAXIWAY LAYOUT THEY SHOULD HAVE A RULE MAKING RWY HOLDING READBACKS MANDATORY. I DO IT ANYWAY BUT IT SHOULD BE A RULE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.