37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 226708 |
Time | |
Date | 199211 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : lhy |
State Reference | PA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 15000 msl bound upper : 15000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : dtw |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute airway : zny |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 12400 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 226708 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Center advised us, upon passing lake henry VOR (lhy), we were approximately 6 mi north of V-58, our assigned airway. Center requested our outbound radial from lhy to which I replied 088 degrees. We immediately corrected to the right, however, we were still not sure why our #1 navigation was showing us centered on the airway. I actually looked at the VOR frequency set in #1 navigation 3 times before I realized it was tuned to williamsport (ipt) VOR! Prior to discovering the above, we had tuned #2 navigation to lhy VOR when center advised us we were on V-58 our #2 navigation, which was properly set, indicated we were south of the airway! Once lhy VOR was properly tuned #1 idented on #1 VOR we did show proper airway location. The aircraft VOR check book was on board and current. On the same leg of the flight while working other VOR frequencys, both navigation units were in agreement regarding our position. We also conducted a ground vot check the same day with both navigation units showing proper alignment. Prior to center calling our position, we had been in the process of computing engine performance and true airspeed calculations. After giving the situation much thought, in the future I will properly see what I look at, identify the navigation station, and pay much closer attention to the navigation process, especially when in close proximity to navigation stations. Although there were no traffic conflictions, these are the types of mistakes that can cause those situations to arise.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF CPR SMT ACFT DEVIATED FROM ASSIGNED TRACK DUE TO SETTING THE WRONG NAVAID FREQ.
Narrative: CTR ADVISED US, UPON PASSING LAKE HENRY VOR (LHY), WE WERE APPROX 6 MI N OF V-58, OUR ASSIGNED AIRWAY. CTR REQUESTED OUR OUTBOUND RADIAL FROM LHY TO WHICH I REPLIED 088 DEGS. WE IMMEDIATELY CORRECTED TO THE R, HOWEVER, WE WERE STILL NOT SURE WHY OUR #1 NAV WAS SHOWING US CTRED ON THE AIRWAY. I ACTUALLY LOOKED AT THE VOR FREQ SET IN #1 NAV 3 TIMES BEFORE I REALIZED IT WAS TUNED TO WILLIAMSPORT (IPT) VOR! PRIOR TO DISCOVERING THE ABOVE, WE HAD TUNED #2 NAV TO LHY VOR WHEN CTR ADVISED US WE WERE ON V-58 OUR #2 NAV, WHICH WAS PROPERLY SET, INDICATED WE WERE S OF THE AIRWAY! ONCE LHY VOR WAS PROPERLY TUNED #1 IDENTED ON #1 VOR WE DID SHOW PROPER AIRWAY LOCATION. THE ACFT VOR CHK BOOK WAS ON BOARD AND CURRENT. ON THE SAME LEG OF THE FLT WHILE WORKING OTHER VOR FREQS, BOTH NAV UNITS WERE IN AGREEMENT REGARDING OUR POS. WE ALSO CONDUCTED A GND VOT CHK THE SAME DAY WITH BOTH NAV UNITS SHOWING PROPER ALIGNMENT. PRIOR TO CTR CALLING OUR POS, WE HAD BEEN IN THE PROCESS OF COMPUTING ENG PERFORMANCE AND TRUE AIRSPD CALCULATIONS. AFTER GIVING THE SITUATION MUCH THOUGHT, IN THE FUTURE I WILL PROPERLY SEE WHAT I LOOK AT, IDENT THE NAV STATION, AND PAY MUCH CLOSER ATTN TO THE NAV PROCESS, ESPECIALLY WHEN IN CLOSE PROX TO NAV STATIONS. ALTHOUGH THERE WERE NO TFC CONFLICTIONS, THESE ARE THE TYPES OF MISTAKES THAT CAN CAUSE THOSE SITUATIONS TO ARISE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.