37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 241908 |
Time | |
Date | 199305 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : stl |
State Reference | MO |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 1000 agl bound upper : 1000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : stl |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Large Transport, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 2500 |
ASRS Report | 241908 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Our approach clearance was: join the localizer, cleared for the visual, maintain visual separation from parallel traffic, and finally, maintain a specified airspeed. Problem being with all this is that the airspeed was faster than the traffic, which we passed on final. The FAA inspector on the jump seat was not impressed! This seems to me to be another example of a controller trying to fly an airplane which he/she has little idea of the capabilities and constraints that apply. Better ATC procedures are in order here at stl.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF AN ACR LGT ACFT OVERTOOK THE TFC ON THE PARALLEL DUE TO THE SPD DIFFERENTIAL OF THE 2 ACFT.
Narrative: OUR APCH CLRNC WAS: JOIN THE LOC, CLRED FOR THE VISUAL, MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION FROM PARALLEL TFC, AND FINALLY, MAINTAIN A SPECIFIED AIRSPD. PROB BEING WITH ALL THIS IS THAT THE AIRSPD WAS FASTER THAN THE TFC, WHICH WE PASSED ON FINAL. THE FAA INSPECTOR ON THE JUMP SEAT WAS NOT IMPRESSED! THIS SEEMS TO ME TO BE ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A CTLR TRYING TO FLY AN AIRPLANE WHICH HE/SHE HAS LITTLE IDEA OF THE CAPABILITIES AND CONSTRAINTS THAT APPLY. BETTER ATC PROCS ARE IN ORDER HERE AT STL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.