37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 243824 |
Time | |
Date | 199306 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lax |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2500 msl bound upper : 2500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : lax artcc : zoa |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Large Transport, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 30 flight time total : 5800 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 243824 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : far non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
On radar vectors to intercept runway 24R at lax. Heavy smog and thick haze, bad visibility to west. Flight test procedures occurring between captain and so throughout entire flight. (I was put on this with no flight test training and against my will.) constant chatter between these guys below 10000 ft very distracting. On base intense conversation about malfunctioning nose gear in transit light erupted. Apparently in the middle of all this the captain told approach we had the runway. He never asked me if I had it, so I continued on radar vectors. I don't know if we were really cleared for a visual or not. If we were, I never heard it because of the engineer's constant blabbing about the nose gear light. Apparently what the captain was looking at was the south lax complex, runway 25L/right which is further west than the 24 north complex. I complained that ATC should have turned us by now or cleared us for the ILS. The captain just sat there and said nothing. I initiated a turn because I didn't want to go to mexico! ATC then informed us we were well south of course. With parallel approachs in progress this was a dangerous situation. Neither of us ever had runway 24L or runway 24R in sight at any time during this phase of approach. I feel it is inexcusable for the PNF to call the runway in sight without asking the PF if he has it or not.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: LGT OVERSHOT RWY CTRLINE WITH PARALLEL APCHS IN PROGRESS.
Narrative: ON RADAR VECTORS TO INTERCEPT RWY 24R AT LAX. HVY SMOG AND THICK HAZE, BAD VISIBILITY TO W. FLT TEST PROCS OCCURRING BTWN CAPT AND SO THROUGHOUT ENTIRE FLT. (I WAS PUT ON THIS WITH NO FLT TEST TRAINING AND AGAINST MY WILL.) CONSTANT CHATTER BTWN THESE GUYS BELOW 10000 FT VERY DISTRACTING. ON BASE INTENSE CONVERSATION ABOUT MALFUNCTIONING NOSE GEAR IN TRANSIT LIGHT ERUPTED. APPARENTLY IN THE MIDDLE OF ALL THIS THE CAPT TOLD APCH WE HAD THE RWY. HE NEVER ASKED ME IF I HAD IT, SO I CONTINUED ON RADAR VECTORS. I DON'T KNOW IF WE WERE REALLY CLRED FOR A VISUAL OR NOT. IF WE WERE, I NEVER HEARD IT BECAUSE OF THE ENGINEER'S CONSTANT BLABBING ABOUT THE NOSE GEAR LIGHT. APPARENTLY WHAT THE CAPT WAS LOOKING AT WAS THE S LAX COMPLEX, RWY 25L/R WHICH IS FURTHER W THAN THE 24 N COMPLEX. I COMPLAINED THAT ATC SHOULD HAVE TURNED US BY NOW OR CLRED US FOR THE ILS. THE CAPT JUST SAT THERE AND SAID NOTHING. I INITIATED A TURN BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO GO TO MEXICO! ATC THEN INFORMED US WE WERE WELL S OF COURSE. WITH PARALLEL APCHS IN PROGRESS THIS WAS A DANGEROUS SIT. NEITHER OF US EVER HAD RWY 24L OR RWY 24R IN SIGHT AT ANY TIME DURING THIS PHASE OF APCH. I FEEL IT IS INEXCUSABLE FOR THE PNF TO CALL THE RWY IN SIGHT WITHOUT ASKING THE PF IF HE HAS IT OR NOT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.