Narrative:

We were in phl approach control airspace in descent from 6000 ft. We had visual contact with VFR traffic which was also descending. The TCASII recognized the traffic, then issued a TA, then an RA. We followed TCASII in a 'climb' and stopped climb at 6300 ft. After advising ATC of RA, they questioned 'why.' we responded that we followed RA because of traffic. Apparently, traffic changed rate of descent. Visually, it had appeared that there would be no conflict.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR HAS TFC IN SIGHT BUT FOLLOWS TCASII RA TO CLB.

Narrative: WE WERE IN PHL APCH CTL AIRSPACE IN DSCNT FROM 6000 FT. WE HAD VISUAL CONTACT WITH VFR TFC WHICH WAS ALSO DSNDING. THE TCASII RECOGNIZED THE TFC, THEN ISSUED A TA, THEN AN RA. WE FOLLOWED TCASII IN A 'CLB' AND STOPPED CLB AT 6300 FT. AFTER ADVISING ATC OF RA, THEY QUESTIONED 'WHY.' WE RESPONDED THAT WE FOLLOWED RA BECAUSE OF TFC. APPARENTLY, TFC CHANGED RATE OF DSCNT. VISUALLY, IT HAD APPEARED THAT THERE WOULD BE NO CONFLICT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.