37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 250712 |
Time | |
Date | 199309 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : pdx |
State Reference | OR |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2300 msl bound upper : 3000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : pdx |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Small Transport |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure sid : sid |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 250712 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 200 vertical : 700 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Navigational Facility |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | other physical facility |
Narrative:
After taking off from runway 28R at pdx departure control issued a turn to 160 heading. We were already cleared to 9000 ft (this turn seemed reasonable account runway 28L was closed). Soon, 3 things happened at once: 1) we came on top of an overcast, 2) departure issued an urgent level-off at 3000 ft, 3) the TCASII gave an RA of descend-descend. We followed the TCASII command and observed the conflicting traffic -- which was the small transport which departed IFR just before we did. Apparently (learned from a series of later phone calls). Our radar tag attached itself to another jet departure about 8 mi in front of us -- the turn to 160 heading was really for him. The TCASII saved the day and a very alert controller was seconds behind the TCASII -- but probably would have been too late. I don't understand the technicalities, but contributing to the error was the fact that both aircraft (jets) had transponder codes a few digits apart. If transponder codes were assigned truly at random, the chances of my type of incident could be reduced. Maybe NASA could look into how transponder codes are assigned and find a method which takes advantage of true random assignments.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TRACON ARTS RADAR DOES A DATA TAG SWAP WHICH CAUSES A LTSS OCCURRENCE.
Narrative: AFTER TAKING OFF FROM RWY 28R AT PDX DEP CTL ISSUED A TURN TO 160 HDG. WE WERE ALREADY CLRED TO 9000 FT (THIS TURN SEEMED REASONABLE ACCOUNT RWY 28L WAS CLOSED). SOON, 3 THINGS HAPPENED AT ONCE: 1) WE CAME ON TOP OF AN OVCST, 2) DEP ISSUED AN URGENT LEVEL-OFF AT 3000 FT, 3) THE TCASII GAVE AN RA OF DSND-DSND. WE FOLLOWED THE TCASII COMMAND AND OBSERVED THE CONFLICTING TFC -- WHICH WAS THE SMT WHICH DEPARTED IFR JUST BEFORE WE DID. APPARENTLY (LEARNED FROM A SERIES OF LATER PHONE CALLS). OUR RADAR TAG ATTACHED ITSELF TO ANOTHER JET DEP ABOUT 8 MI IN FRONT OF US -- THE TURN TO 160 HDG WAS REALLY FOR HIM. THE TCASII SAVED THE DAY AND A VERY ALERT CTLR WAS SECONDS BEHIND THE TCASII -- BUT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN TOO LATE. I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE TECHNICALITIES, BUT CONTRIBUTING TO THE ERROR WAS THE FACT THAT BOTH ACFT (JETS) HAD XPONDER CODES A FEW DIGITS APART. IF XPONDER CODES WERE ASSIGNED TRULY AT RANDOM, THE CHANCES OF MY TYPE OF INCIDENT COULD BE REDUCED. MAYBE NASA COULD LOOK INTO HOW XPONDER CODES ARE ASSIGNED AND FIND A METHOD WHICH TAKES ADVANTAGE OF TRUE RANDOM ASSIGNMENTS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.