37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 257541 |
Time | |
Date | 199311 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : cgf |
State Reference | OH |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1900 msl bound upper : 1900 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : cle tower : cgf |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Recip Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : atp pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 257541 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 2800 flight time type : 1 |
ASRS Report | 257438 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical incursion : runway non adherence : clearance non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : declared emergency other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
At approximately XA45 local we departed 29G to reposition the aircraft to cgf. Upon contacting cgf tower we were advised that the control zone was IFR. We then contacted cle approach and requested and received a special VFR clearance into the cgf control zone. Approximately 3 mi from the airport the left engine started to surge along with its fuel pressure. While trying to isolate this problem approach control called us twice. We then reported to approach we had the airport. We attempted to contact cgf tower with no response. Since WX conditions were less than VFR and we had not yet isolated the engine/fuel problem, we elected that the safest action would be to land on runway 23 (runway 5 was active). On touchdown the l-hand engine not running. After landing we contacted the tower by landline and informed them what had happened. They said there was no problem and would not take any action. Preliminary maintenance reports indicate a failure of both primary fuel pump and boost pump. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following: reporter states he does not believe they declared an emergency because they were too busy trying to determine the problem and did not have time to communicate. Problem determined to be a recently replaced fuel selector valve which was blocked and caused fuel starvation. Report sent because controller seemed upset due to aircraft waiting on opposite end of runway. Reporter does not think anything will come of it.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SMT HAS ENG SURGE THEN QUIT ON SVFR CLRNC. LAND OPPOSITE DIRECTION RWY.
Narrative: AT APPROX XA45 LCL WE DEPARTED 29G TO REPOSITION THE ACFT TO CGF. UPON CONTACTING CGF TWR WE WERE ADVISED THAT THE CTL ZONE WAS IFR. WE THEN CONTACTED CLE APCH AND REQUESTED AND RECEIVED A SPECIAL VFR CLRNC INTO THE CGF CTL ZONE. APPROX 3 MI FROM THE ARPT THE L ENG STARTED TO SURGE ALONG WITH ITS FUEL PRESSURE. WHILE TRYING TO ISOLATE THIS PROB APCH CTL CALLED US TWICE. WE THEN RPTED TO APCH WE HAD THE ARPT. WE ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT CGF TWR WITH NO RESPONSE. SINCE WX CONDITIONS WERE LESS THAN VFR AND WE HAD NOT YET ISOLATED THE ENG/FUEL PROB, WE ELECTED THAT THE SAFEST ACTION WOULD BE TO LAND ON RWY 23 (RWY 5 WAS ACTIVE). ON TOUCHDOWN THE L-HAND ENG NOT RUNNING. AFTER LNDG WE CONTACTED THE TWR BY LANDLINE AND INFORMED THEM WHAT HAD HAPPENED. THEY SAID THERE WAS NO PROB AND WOULD NOT TAKE ANY ACTION. PRELIMINARY MAINT RPTS INDICATE A FAILURE OF BOTH PRIMARY FUEL PUMP AND BOOST PUMP. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH REPORTER REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: RPTR STATES HE DOES NOT BELIEVE THEY DECLARED AN EMER BECAUSE THEY WERE TOO BUSY TRYING TO DETERMINE THE PROB AND DID NOT HAVE TIME TO COMMUNICATE. PROB DETERMINED TO BE A RECENTLY REPLACED FUEL SELECTOR VALVE WHICH WAS BLOCKED AND CAUSED FUEL STARVATION. RPT SENT BECAUSE CTLR SEEMED UPSET DUE TO ACFT WAITING ON OPPOSITE END OF RWY. RPTR DOES NOT THINK ANYTHING WILL COME OF IT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.