37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 258361 |
Time | |
Date | 199311 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : mem airport : vcy |
State Reference | TN |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 5000 msl bound upper : 5000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute airway : zme |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 45 flight time total : 660 flight time type : 50 |
ASRS Report | 258361 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
We were on an IFR flight plan south of the mem class B airspace in an small aircraft. Our first indication of trouble came when ZME told su they were no longer receiving our transponder. Upon checking the ammeter, we noticed it was not 'pulling a load.' in anticipation of a radio failure, we chose to cancel our IFR and continue the flight in VMC conditions. However, we were unable to inform ZME of our intention before complete radio failure. The last transmission we heard was another aircraft informing center they heard us say we were canceling IFR. We continued the flight under VFR and deviated around the mem class B. Without a landing light we decided it would be most practicable to land at our home base, ucy. Sits such as this could be avoided if aircraft were equipped with instrumentation that warns of imminent alternator failure, not just tells a pilot after the fact. Another option could be placing a redundant electric system on aircraft flown under IFR.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN SMA INSTRUCTOR RPTS AN ELECTRICAL FAILURE AT NIGHT ON AN IFR FLT PLAN.
Narrative: WE WERE ON AN IFR FLT PLAN S OF THE MEM CLASS B AIRSPACE IN AN SMA. OUR FIRST INDICATION OF TROUBLE CAME WHEN ZME TOLD SU THEY WERE NO LONGER RECEIVING OUR XPONDER. UPON CHKING THE AMMETER, WE NOTICED IT WAS NOT 'PULLING A LOAD.' IN ANTICIPATION OF A RADIO FAILURE, WE CHOSE TO CANCEL OUR IFR AND CONTINUE THE FLT IN VMC CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, WE WERE UNABLE TO INFORM ZME OF OUR INTENTION BEFORE COMPLETE RADIO FAILURE. THE LAST XMISSION WE HEARD WAS ANOTHER ACFT INFORMING CTR THEY HEARD US SAY WE WERE CANCELING IFR. WE CONTINUED THE FLT UNDER VFR AND DEVIATED AROUND THE MEM CLASS B. WITHOUT A LNDG LIGHT WE DECIDED IT WOULD BE MOST PRACTICABLE TO LAND AT OUR HOME BASE, UCY. SITS SUCH AS THIS COULD BE AVOIDED IF ACFT WERE EQUIPPED WITH INSTRUMENTATION THAT WARNS OF IMMINENT ALTERNATOR FAILURE, NOT JUST TELLS A PLT AFTER THE FACT. ANOTHER OPTION COULD BE PLACING A REDUNDANT ELECTRIC SYS ON ACFT FLOWN UNDER IFR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.