37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 258378 |
Time | |
Date | 199312 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : hkg |
State Reference | FO |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 3000 msl bound upper : 3000 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : hkg |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Heavy Transport, Low Wing, 4 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 130 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 5500 |
ASRS Report | 258378 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
In sum: an air carrier freighter crew had to abandon an ADF approach at hkg because the adfs did not agree with the radar track of approach. Both ADF are used for this approach, and both seemed to be out of tolerance. The reporting captain has tried to get his company to improve the adfs to no avail as 'you don't use them that much anyway' is the attitude expressed by his company. The crew made an ASR approach successfully. The ADF in the subject air carrier heavy transport does not compare favorably with the ADF in the reporter's small aircraft twin.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN ACR FREIGHTER CREW HAD TO ABANDON AN ADF APCH FOR AN ASR APCH.
Narrative: IN SUM: AN ACR FREIGHTER CREW HAD TO ABANDON AN ADF APCH AT HKG BECAUSE THE ADFS DID NOT AGREE WITH THE RADAR TRACK OF APCH. BOTH ADF ARE USED FOR THIS APCH, AND BOTH SEEMED TO BE OUT OF TOLERANCE. THE RPTING CAPT HAS TRIED TO GET HIS COMPANY TO IMPROVE THE ADFS TO NO AVAIL AS 'YOU DON'T USE THEM THAT MUCH ANYWAY' IS THE ATTITUDE EXPRESSED BY HIS COMPANY. THE CREW MADE AN ASR APCH SUCCESSFULLY. THE ADF IN THE SUBJECT ACR HVT DOES NOT COMPARE FAVORABLY WITH THE ADF IN THE RPTR'S SMA TWIN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.