37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 260849 |
Time | |
Date | 199401 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lax |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 4500 msl bound upper : 4500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lax |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B767 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : unknown |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer other personnel other |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time type : 850 |
ASRS Report | 260849 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : unspecified other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 6000 vertical : 1000 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
It was the end of an 11 hour flight and 7 day trip as we approached the lax terminal area from the north. It was a clear 30 mi visibility day. We were assigned a heading 070 degrees after santa monica VOR and the captain asked the first officer to load runway 25L in the FMC even though we were to expect runway 24R. (It was in the hope we would be assigned 25 at the last min.) approach turned us heading 140 degrees and asked us if we had 1 O'clock traffic in sight for runway 24R. We said yes. Approach then cleared us for visual approach runway 24R to follow traffic and switch to tower. The first officer was switching radios and the captain was flying. I was the relief first officer watching for traffic. I noticed the captain wasn't turning final when I thought it was time. I then asked if we were still cleared for runway 24R or had I missed something and it was changed? The captain said we were still cleared runway 24R. I then asked if he had the airport in sight? He said yes. About that time the first officer told him also to go to runway 24R. By this time he was lining up with the 25's instead of runway 24R. We were telling him it was the wrong runway when we had a TCASII RA. It told us to climb which the captain did. At the same time lax tower discovered our error and said she had us and the runway 25 traffic in sight and for us to proceed to runway 24R. We landed without further incident. On debrief the captain said he knew we were cleared runway 24R but he had it in his mind runway 25 was runway 24. Also the FMC was never changed back from 25L to 24R. So he had information, even though false, to back him up.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CAPT OF A WDB ACR ACFT OVERSHOT THE FINAL APCH COURSE CAUSING A TCASII RA AND EVASIVE ACTION CLB IN RESPONSE TO THE WARNING AND SUBSEQUENT INTERVENTION BY ATC TO BRING THE RPTR BACK ON TRACK.
Narrative: IT WAS THE END OF AN 11 HR FLT AND 7 DAY TRIP AS WE APCHED THE LAX TERMINAL AREA FROM THE N. IT WAS A CLR 30 MI VISIBILITY DAY. WE WERE ASSIGNED A HDG 070 DEGS AFTER SANTA MONICA VOR AND THE CAPT ASKED THE FO TO LOAD RWY 25L IN THE FMC EVEN THOUGH WE WERE TO EXPECT RWY 24R. (IT WAS IN THE HOPE WE WOULD BE ASSIGNED 25 AT THE LAST MIN.) APCH TURNED US HDG 140 DEGS AND ASKED US IF WE HAD 1 O'CLOCK TFC IN SIGHT FOR RWY 24R. WE SAID YES. APCH THEN CLRED US FOR VISUAL APCH RWY 24R TO FOLLOW TFC AND SWITCH TO TWR. THE FO WAS SWITCHING RADIOS AND THE CAPT WAS FLYING. I WAS THE RELIEF FO WATCHING FOR TFC. I NOTICED THE CAPT WASN'T TURNING FINAL WHEN I THOUGHT IT WAS TIME. I THEN ASKED IF WE WERE STILL CLRED FOR RWY 24R OR HAD I MISSED SOMETHING AND IT WAS CHANGED? THE CAPT SAID WE WERE STILL CLRED RWY 24R. I THEN ASKED IF HE HAD THE ARPT IN SIGHT? HE SAID YES. ABOUT THAT TIME THE FO TOLD HIM ALSO TO GO TO RWY 24R. BY THIS TIME HE WAS LINING UP WITH THE 25'S INSTEAD OF RWY 24R. WE WERE TELLING HIM IT WAS THE WRONG RWY WHEN WE HAD A TCASII RA. IT TOLD US TO CLB WHICH THE CAPT DID. AT THE SAME TIME LAX TWR DISCOVERED OUR ERROR AND SAID SHE HAD US AND THE RWY 25 TFC IN SIGHT AND FOR US TO PROCEED TO RWY 24R. WE LANDED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. ON DEBRIEF THE CAPT SAID HE KNEW WE WERE CLRED RWY 24R BUT HE HAD IT IN HIS MIND RWY 25 WAS RWY 24. ALSO THE FMC WAS NEVER CHANGED BACK FROM 25L TO 24R. SO HE HAD INFO, EVEN THOUGH FALSE, TO BACK HIM UP.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.