37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 263432 |
Time | |
Date | 199402 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ord |
State Reference | IL |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 4000 msl bound upper : 4000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : ord |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 90 flight time total : 6000 flight time type : 90 |
ASRS Report | 263432 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : exited adverse environment |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Weather |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation other |
Narrative:
We made an approach into ord during a time that had limited visibility. I am a 'high minimums' captain and require 1/2 mi (or equivalent RVR) be added to the published minimums. Approach advised that the visibility was 4000 ft RVR. I relayed to them that I needed at least 5000 ft RVR to be legal. They acknowledged that and told me the tower would advise me if conditions improved at the marker. At an altitude of 4000 ft, we could see the ground and had a forward visibility of over 3 mi. The tower, however, called the RVR at 3500 ft so we initiated a missed approach. At this time, we noticed a large increase in the ice accretion. On the second approach, the tower called the visibility to be 1 1/2 mi from the tower. With over 2 inches of ice adhering to the aircraft, I elected to land and felt that it was the safest course of action. An uneventful landing followed.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: HIGH MINIMUMS CAPT DEALS WITH WX BELOW HIS MINIMUMS.
Narrative: WE MADE AN APCH INTO ORD DURING A TIME THAT HAD LIMITED VISIBILITY. I AM A 'HIGH MINIMUMS' CAPT AND REQUIRE 1/2 MI (OR EQUIVALENT RVR) BE ADDED TO THE PUBLISHED MINIMUMS. APCH ADVISED THAT THE VISIBILITY WAS 4000 FT RVR. I RELAYED TO THEM THAT I NEEDED AT LEAST 5000 FT RVR TO BE LEGAL. THEY ACKNOWLEDGED THAT AND TOLD ME THE TWR WOULD ADVISE ME IF CONDITIONS IMPROVED AT THE MARKER. AT AN ALT OF 4000 FT, WE COULD SEE THE GND AND HAD A FORWARD VISIBILITY OF OVER 3 MI. THE TWR, HOWEVER, CALLED THE RVR AT 3500 FT SO WE INITIATED A MISSED APCH. AT THIS TIME, WE NOTICED A LARGE INCREASE IN THE ICE ACCRETION. ON THE SECOND APCH, THE TWR CALLED THE VISIBILITY TO BE 1 1/2 MI FROM THE TWR. WITH OVER 2 INCHES OF ICE ADHERING TO THE ACFT, I ELECTED TO LAND AND FELT THAT IT WAS THE SAFEST COURSE OF ACTION. AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG FOLLOWED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.