37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 264392 |
Time | |
Date | 199402 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lga |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zmp |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 8200 flight time type : 2500 |
ASRS Report | 264392 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
As we advanced the throttles for takeoff, the takeoff warning horn sounded. We rejected the takeoff and taxied clear of runway. We checked to see if the flaps, spdbrake, or trim tabs were not set, but everything was set in the correct position for takeoff. I told the captain that we should go back to the gate 3 times. He said there was nothing wrong with the aircraft and that he was going to takeoff. In ground school, it has been suggested that for any rejected takeoff we should return to the gate and make some type of write-up in the logbook. To make a long story short, we re-ran the checklist, made another takeoff, which was uneventful. The only thing we found that might have caused the takeoff horn was the pointer on one of the trim wheels was not aligned with the other pointer. The trim setting that we were using put the line of the pointer close to the limit for takeoff. When a person should return to the gate after an attempted takeoff is not a clearly defined area. Maybe it should be better defined in company training and operations manuals.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MLG ABORTS TKOF AS WARNING HORN SOUNDS.
Narrative: AS WE ADVANCED THE THROTTLES FOR TKOF, THE TKOF WARNING HORN SOUNDED. WE REJECTED THE TKOF AND TAXIED CLR OF RWY. WE CHKED TO SEE IF THE FLAPS, SPDBRAKE, OR TRIM TABS WERE NOT SET, BUT EVERYTHING WAS SET IN THE CORRECT POS FOR TKOF. I TOLD THE CAPT THAT WE SHOULD GO BACK TO THE GATE 3 TIMES. HE SAID THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE ACFT AND THAT HE WAS GOING TO TKOF. IN GND SCHOOL, IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT FOR ANY REJECTED TKOF WE SHOULD RETURN TO THE GATE AND MAKE SOME TYPE OF WRITE-UP IN THE LOGBOOK. TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT, WE RE-RAN THE CHKLIST, MADE ANOTHER TKOF, WHICH WAS UNEVENTFUL. THE ONLY THING WE FOUND THAT MIGHT HAVE CAUSED THE TKOF HORN WAS THE POINTER ON ONE OF THE TRIM WHEELS WAS NOT ALIGNED WITH THE OTHER POINTER. THE TRIM SETTING THAT WE WERE USING PUT THE LINE OF THE POINTER CLOSE TO THE LIMIT FOR TKOF. WHEN A PERSON SHOULD RETURN TO THE GATE AFTER AN ATTEMPTED TKOF IS NOT A CLRLY DEFINED AREA. MAYBE IT SHOULD BE BETTER DEFINED IN COMPANY TRAINING AND OPS MANUALS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.