37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 267398 |
Time | |
Date | 199404 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ojc |
State Reference | KS |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | arrival other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 3400 flight time type : 30 |
ASRS Report | 267398 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : non radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : far non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I was inbound to ojc from northeast, landing to the south on runway 17. I was requested by the tower to report 3 mi out, which I did. The airplane that I was following told the tower that there was an airplane at the end of runway 17 and was told to do a go around by the tower. I was watching the airplane doing the go around and spotted a plane on the end of the runway. I continued toward the runway and was cleared to land 2 mi out. As I continued toward the airport, the plane that I thought was on the end of the runway remained there. I asked the tower if I was cleared to land and I was told that I was cleared to land. Since I thought that it was unusual for me to be given instructions to land, when the previous airplane was given instructions to go around, I asked again if I was cleared to land. The tower confirmed that I was cleared to land. I planned my approach and landing beyond the aircraft which I thought was on the end of the runway. When I began my flare, I realized that I was on the parallel taxiway and thought at that time that the safest option was to land rather than to go around, since there was adequate length with no other aircraft in conflict. Prior to landing, I heard tower trying to make contact with the airplane on the end of the runway and did not hear a response from that aircraft. Therefore, I assumed the aircraft which I saw, remained on the end of the runway. In retrospect, the factor that contributed to this error was that there had been an identified plane on the end of runway 17. I then misidented that plane on the runway which actually was on the parallel taxiway. I was focused on the plane at the end of the taxiway and the plane doing the go around. It was PM30 and the sun was directly in my eyes, which made visibility poor. Any time that anything appears to be in conflict I should have asked for further ATC clarification. I have learned a lesson from this and will try to prevent this from ever happening again in the future.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN SMA LANDED ON TXWY, OVER THE TOP OF AN ACFT HOLING ON THE TXWY.
Narrative: I WAS INBOUND TO OJC FROM NE, LNDG TO THE S ON RWY 17. I WAS REQUESTED BY THE TWR TO RPT 3 MI OUT, WHICH I DID. THE AIRPLANE THAT I WAS FOLLOWING TOLD THE TWR THAT THERE WAS AN AIRPLANE AT THE END OF RWY 17 AND WAS TOLD TO DO A GAR BY THE TWR. I WAS WATCHING THE AIRPLANE DOING THE GAR AND SPOTTED A PLANE ON THE END OF THE RWY. I CONTINUED TOWARD THE RWY AND WAS CLRED TO LAND 2 MI OUT. AS I CONTINUED TOWARD THE ARPT, THE PLANE THAT I THOUGHT WAS ON THE END OF THE RWY REMAINED THERE. I ASKED THE TWR IF I WAS CLRED TO LAND AND I WAS TOLD THAT I WAS CLRED TO LAND. SINCE I THOUGHT THAT IT WAS UNUSUAL FOR ME TO BE GIVEN INSTRUCTIONS TO LAND, WHEN THE PREVIOUS AIRPLANE WAS GIVEN INSTRUCTIONS TO GAR, I ASKED AGAIN IF I WAS CLRED TO LAND. THE TWR CONFIRMED THAT I WAS CLRED TO LAND. I PLANNED MY APCH AND LNDG BEYOND THE ACFT WHICH I THOUGHT WAS ON THE END OF THE RWY. WHEN I BEGAN MY FLARE, I REALIZED THAT I WAS ON THE PARALLEL TXWY AND THOUGHT AT THAT TIME THAT THE SAFEST OPTION WAS TO LAND RATHER THAN TO GAR, SINCE THERE WAS ADEQUATE LENGTH WITH NO OTHER ACFT IN CONFLICT. PRIOR TO LNDG, I HEARD TWR TRYING TO MAKE CONTACT WITH THE AIRPLANE ON THE END OF THE RWY AND DID NOT HEAR A RESPONSE FROM THAT ACFT. THEREFORE, I ASSUMED THE ACFT WHICH I SAW, REMAINED ON THE END OF THE RWY. IN RETROSPECT, THE FACTOR THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THIS ERROR WAS THAT THERE HAD BEEN AN IDENTIFIED PLANE ON THE END OF RWY 17. I THEN MISIDENTED THAT PLANE ON THE RWY WHICH ACTUALLY WAS ON THE PARALLEL TXWY. I WAS FOCUSED ON THE PLANE AT THE END OF THE TXWY AND THE PLANE DOING THE GAR. IT WAS PM30 AND THE SUN WAS DIRECTLY IN MY EYES, WHICH MADE VISIBILITY POOR. ANY TIME THAT ANYTHING APPEARS TO BE IN CONFLICT I SHOULD HAVE ASKED FOR FURTHER ATC CLARIFICATION. I HAVE LEARNED A LESSON FROM THIS AND WILL TRY TO PREVENT THIS FROM EVER HAPPENING AGAIN IN THE FUTURE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.