37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 267768 |
Time | |
Date | 199403 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : sbv |
State Reference | VA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 21000 msl bound upper : 21000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zdc |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : other |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | enroute : direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Jetstream 31 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute : direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller non radar : 7 controller radar : 6 |
ASRS Report | 267768 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : military |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : military |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 24000 vertical : 500 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
I was assigned radar position at sector 22, with traffic volume and complexity increasing. The volume was approximately 20-21 aircraft, complexity was the rdv arrival sequencing with jet and propeller - gso arrival and departures, crossing and opposite direction traffic for both arrs. Military act X requested lower, I issued descent clearance after researching (scanning) his potential traffic being the rdv arrs opposite direction to him. The BA31 Y crossing traffic I didn't consider potential conflict. The difference in speed between 2 aircraft caused the BA31 to enter protected airspace of the air evacuate/evacuation with less than minimum separation. Just a few mins prior to the occurrence, I requested help in position of radar associate due to increasing volume and complexity and received it 1 min prior to incident. The conflict alert activated after (or as) separation was lost, there was no prior warning.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MIL X DSCNT THROUGH OCCUPIED ALT HAD LTSS FROM ACR Y. SYS ERROR.
Narrative: I WAS ASSIGNED RADAR POS AT SECTOR 22, WITH TFC VOLUME AND COMPLEXITY INCREASING. THE VOLUME WAS APPROX 20-21 ACFT, COMPLEXITY WAS THE RDV ARR SEQUENCING WITH JET AND PROP - GSO ARR AND DEPS, XING AND OPPOSITE DIRECTION TFC FOR BOTH ARRS. MIL ACT X REQUESTED LOWER, I ISSUED DSCNT CLRNC AFTER RESEARCHING (SCANNING) HIS POTENTIAL TFC BEING THE RDV ARRS OPPOSITE DIRECTION TO HIM. THE BA31 Y XING TFC I DIDN'T CONSIDER POTENTIAL CONFLICT. THE DIFFERENCE IN SPD BTWN 2 ACFT CAUSED THE BA31 TO ENTER PROTECTED AIRSPACE OF THE AIR EVAC WITH LESS THAN MINIMUM SEPARATION. JUST A FEW MINS PRIOR TO THE OCCURRENCE, I REQUESTED HELP IN POS OF RADAR ASSOCIATE DUE TO INCREASING VOLUME AND COMPLEXITY AND RECEIVED IT 1 MIN PRIOR TO INCIDENT. THE CONFLICT ALERT ACTIVATED AFTER (OR AS) SEPARATION WAS LOST, THERE WAS NO PRIOR WARNING.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.