Narrative:

Aircraft X cleared a 'visual approach' to las runway 25L. I misread the altitude at 15 NM as being 4300 ft MSL versus 4800 ft. Approach control (las) called and said they had a low altitude alert on our aircraft. We immediately climbed to 4800 ft and continued the approach and landing. Las vegas has 'very' clear visibility 20-50 mi, a long narrow runway (25 left) and can be very deceptive. As to relative position of runway, aircraft and relative position. (The appearance of being high on approach, when in reality you are low.) I believe that a 'highly visible' VASI on all runways at las is imperative.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACFT X CONTROLLED FLT TOWARD TERRAIN ISSUED LOW ALT ALT BY CTLR RETURNED ACFT TO PROPER ALT. VISUAL APCH IN USE.

Narrative: ACFT X CLRED A 'VISUAL APCH' TO LAS RWY 25L. I MISREAD THE ALT AT 15 NM AS BEING 4300 FT MSL VERSUS 4800 FT. APCH CTL (LAS) CALLED AND SAID THEY HAD A LOW ALT ALERT ON OUR ACFT. WE IMMEDIATELY CLBED TO 4800 FT AND CONTINUED THE APCH AND LNDG. LAS VEGAS HAS 'VERY' CLR VISIBILITY 20-50 MI, A LONG NARROW RWY (25 L) AND CAN BE VERY DECEPTIVE. AS TO RELATIVE POS OF RWY, ACFT AND RELATIVE POS. (THE APPEARANCE OF BEING HIGH ON APCH, WHEN IN REALITY YOU ARE LOW.) I BELIEVE THAT A 'HIGHLY VISIBLE' VASI ON ALL RWYS AT LAS IS IMPERATIVE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.