An air crewman and an ARTCC radar controller disagreed over an aircraft routing.

Attributes
ACN	275174
Time
Date	199406
Day	Fri
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	atc facility : crg
State Reference	FL
Altitude	msl bound lower : 33000 msl bound upper : 33000
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	artcc : zjx
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Commercial Fixed Wing
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	cruise other
Route In Use	departure other departure sid : sid enroute : on vectors
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : cfi pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 2000
ASRS Report	275174
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other controllera other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	controller : issued new clearance none taken : detected after the fact other
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Chart Or Publication
Air Traffic Incident	other
Situations
Publication	Unspecified

Narrative:

While at FL330 on mccoy 2 departure out of orlando, center advised our flight to turn left 20 degrees for opposing traffic (altitude unknown). Center later advised that radial for that segment of flight should be the crg 007 degree radial. Yes, the high chart #7/8 united states does show new radial of 007 degrees in recent change. However, the orlando mccoy 2 SID still shows the crg 014 degree radial to the sav 012 degree radial as the appropriate route when cleared via the sav transition. Upon reaching my base the next day, I checked my mail box, and there were no new revisions. No known conflict was mentioned due to flight on crg 014 degree radial, but we were vectored.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN AIR CREWMAN AND AN ARTCC RADAR CTLR DISAGREED OVER AN ACFT ROUTING.

Narrative: WHILE AT FL330 ON MCCOY 2 DEP OUT OF ORLANDO, CTR ADVISED OUR FLT TO TURN L 20 DEGS FOR OPPOSING TFC (ALT UNKNOWN). CTR LATER ADVISED THAT RADIAL FOR THAT SEGMENT OF FLT SHOULD BE THE CRG 007 DEG RADIAL. YES, THE HIGH CHART #7/8 UNITED STATES DOES SHOW NEW RADIAL OF 007 DEGS IN RECENT CHANGE. HOWEVER, THE ORLANDO MCCOY 2 SID STILL SHOWS THE CRG 014 DEG RADIAL TO THE SAV 012 DEG RADIAL AS THE APPROPRIATE RTE WHEN CLRED VIA THE SAV TRANSITION. UPON REACHING MY BASE THE NEXT DAY, I CHKED MY MAIL BOX, AND THERE WERE NO NEW REVISIONS. NO KNOWN CONFLICT WAS MENTIONED DUE TO FLT ON CRG 014 DEG RADIAL, BUT WE WERE VECTORED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.