37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 278054 |
Time | |
Date | 199407 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : hya |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1000 msl bound upper : 1700 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : pvd |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other landing : missed approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 40 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 3500 |
ASRS Report | 278054 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation other |
Narrative:
On jul/tue/94, filed IFR from 4b8 to cqx after obtaining WX briefing (WX not as good as forecast). Controller vectored me for VFR approach to cqx, but WX was IMC. ADF became inoperative but came back on and an NDB-a approach was initiated. Declared a 'missed approach' when airport was not visible at minimum descent altitude and asked for the alternate (hya). Was given 3000 ft and vectors for localizer runway 24 (GS was OTS). Then given descent to 1700 ft until established on localizer. While maneuvering to capture localizer, much traffic was being handled and some instructions were confusing because I had to ask several times if instructions were for 'MM.' also, was asked 'on approach' to tune in ATIS. While all this was transpiring, my vertical compass started spinning and I was unable to reset my directional gyroscope. The turn and bank stopped indicating and my electric and manual trim was binding. With all this confusion, I obviously left my minimum altitude. The controller advised me of an 'altitude alert' and ordered me to 3000 ft and turned me over to another controller who gave me vectors for another approach. Approach was completed to minimums in spite of continuing problems. Aircraft was taxied to a repair facility for service where an FAA inspector questioned me extensively and indicated he would not file a violation. Obviously, I allowed my distraction with the instrument malfunctions and confusing controller instructions to break the cardinal altitude rule.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CTLR RESPONDS TO ALT ALERT AND GETS ACFT BACK TO PROPER ALT.
Narrative: ON JUL/TUE/94, FILED IFR FROM 4B8 TO CQX AFTER OBTAINING WX BRIEFING (WX NOT AS GOOD AS FORECAST). CTLR VECTORED ME FOR VFR APCH TO CQX, BUT WX WAS IMC. ADF BECAME INOP BUT CAME BACK ON AND AN NDB-A APCH WAS INITIATED. DECLARED A 'MISSED APCH' WHEN ARPT WAS NOT VISIBLE AT MINIMUM DSCNT ALT AND ASKED FOR THE ALTERNATE (HYA). WAS GIVEN 3000 FT AND VECTORS FOR LOC RWY 24 (GS WAS OTS). THEN GIVEN DSCNT TO 1700 FT UNTIL ESTABLISHED ON LOC. WHILE MANEUVERING TO CAPTURE LOC, MUCH TFC WAS BEING HANDLED AND SOME INSTRUCTIONS WERE CONFUSING BECAUSE I HAD TO ASK SEVERAL TIMES IF INSTRUCTIONS WERE FOR 'MM.' ALSO, WAS ASKED 'ON APCH' TO TUNE IN ATIS. WHILE ALL THIS WAS TRANSPIRING, MY VERT COMPASS STARTED SPINNING AND I WAS UNABLE TO RESET MY DIRECTIONAL GYROSCOPE. THE TURN AND BANK STOPPED INDICATING AND MY ELECTRIC AND MANUAL TRIM WAS BINDING. WITH ALL THIS CONFUSION, I OBVIOUSLY LEFT MY MINIMUM ALT. THE CTLR ADVISED ME OF AN 'ALT ALERT' AND ORDERED ME TO 3000 FT AND TURNED ME OVER TO ANOTHER CTLR WHO GAVE ME VECTORS FOR ANOTHER APCH. APCH WAS COMPLETED TO MINIMUMS IN SPITE OF CONTINUING PROBS. ACFT WAS TAXIED TO A REPAIR FACILITY FOR SVC WHERE AN FAA INSPECTOR QUESTIONED ME EXTENSIVELY AND INDICATED HE WOULD NOT FILE A VIOLATION. OBVIOUSLY, I ALLOWED MY DISTR WITH THE INST MALFUNCTIONS AND CONFUSING CTLR INSTRUCTIONS TO BREAK THE CARDINAL ALT RULE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.