37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 278233 |
Time | |
Date | 199407 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : msy |
State Reference | LA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1000 msl bound upper : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : msy |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-500 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 1800 |
ASRS Report | 278233 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : clearance non adherence : required legal separation other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 2500 vertical : 600 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
There was rain in the area. Ceiling was about 2000 ft with visibility good below the ceiling. New orleans approach control was vectoring us for a runway 19 approach. We were at 1500 ft on a 280 degree heading, west of the bridge and east of the approach course. Another B-737 was ahead of us for runway 19. My first officer saw a commuter coming from our right on an intercepting course. He was either at our altitude or descending to our altitude. As I received an RA to descend, I descended to 1000 ft and the commuter passed overhead, missing us by about 600 ft. We informed approach control of our evasive maneuver and completed the approach without further incident. The approach control supervisor told me that he thought the commuter misidented the B-737 in front of us as the aircraft he was to follow. Approach control had intended him to follow us. The approach control supervisor was concerned that the approach controller may have given incomplete instructions to the commuter. TCASII and alert action on our part prevented a collision. Supplemental information from acn 278239: we were being vectored north of the airport around a thunderstorm which was along the approach course of the localizer back course runway 19. Our position was just under the lowest layer of clouds north of the thunderstorm. The controller asked us if we had our traffic to follow at 2 O'clock and some mi (I do not recall the distance at this time). We both saw traffic at our 2 O'clock position and reported 'traffic in sight.' we were then cleared to follow that aircraft to the runway and cleared for the visual approach to runway 19. As we got closer we were instructed our traffic was squaring the turn to final. At that time, we noticed an aircraft off the left 9 O'clock position which was about 500 ft below and 1/2 mi away. We told the controller we were following the aircraft on final approach. He told us we were supposed to be following the aircraft at our 9 O'clock, who was not behind us at 1 mi. We had a near miss with a boeing 737 type while following the wrong aircraft to the runway. This was not an intentional event -- we thought we were following the right aircraft!!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TCASII RA.
Narrative: THERE WAS RAIN IN THE AREA. CEILING WAS ABOUT 2000 FT WITH VISIBILITY GOOD BELOW THE CEILING. NEW ORLEANS APCH CTL WAS VECTORING US FOR A RWY 19 APCH. WE WERE AT 1500 FT ON A 280 DEG HDG, W OF THE BRIDGE AND E OF THE APCH COURSE. ANOTHER B-737 WAS AHEAD OF US FOR RWY 19. MY FO SAW A COMMUTER COMING FROM OUR R ON AN INTERCEPTING COURSE. HE WAS EITHER AT OUR ALT OR DSNDING TO OUR ALT. AS I RECEIVED AN RA TO DSND, I DSNDED TO 1000 FT AND THE COMMUTER PASSED OVERHEAD, MISSING US BY ABOUT 600 FT. WE INFORMED APCH CTL OF OUR EVASIVE MANEUVER AND COMPLETED THE APCH WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. THE APCH CTL SUPVR TOLD ME THAT HE THOUGHT THE COMMUTER MISIDENTED THE B-737 IN FRONT OF US AS THE ACFT HE WAS TO FOLLOW. APCH CTL HAD INTENDED HIM TO FOLLOW US. THE APCH CTL SUPVR WAS CONCERNED THAT THE APCH CTLR MAY HAVE GIVEN INCOMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE COMMUTER. TCASII AND ALERT ACTION ON OUR PART PREVENTED A COLLISION. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 278239: WE WERE BEING VECTORED N OF THE ARPT AROUND A TSTM WHICH WAS ALONG THE APCH COURSE OF THE LOC BC RWY 19. OUR POS WAS JUST UNDER THE LOWEST LAYER OF CLOUDS N OF THE TSTM. THE CTLR ASKED US IF WE HAD OUR TFC TO FOLLOW AT 2 O'CLOCK AND SOME MI (I DO NOT RECALL THE DISTANCE AT THIS TIME). WE BOTH SAW TFC AT OUR 2 O'CLOCK POS AND RPTED 'TFC IN SIGHT.' WE WERE THEN CLRED TO FOLLOW THAT ACFT TO THE RWY AND CLRED FOR THE VISUAL APCH TO RWY 19. AS WE GOT CLOSER WE WERE INSTRUCTED OUR TFC WAS SQUARING THE TURN TO FINAL. AT THAT TIME, WE NOTICED AN ACFT OFF THE L 9 O'CLOCK POS WHICH WAS ABOUT 500 FT BELOW AND 1/2 MI AWAY. WE TOLD THE CTLR WE WERE FOLLOWING THE ACFT ON FINAL APCH. HE TOLD US WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE FOLLOWING THE ACFT AT OUR 9 O'CLOCK, WHO WAS NOT BEHIND US AT 1 MI. WE HAD A NEAR MISS WITH A BOEING 737 TYPE WHILE FOLLOWING THE WRONG ACFT TO THE RWY. THIS WAS NOT AN INTENTIONAL EVENT -- WE THOUGHT WE WERE FOLLOWING THE RIGHT ACFT!!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.