37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 282708 |
Time | |
Date | 199409 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : cjs |
State Reference | FO |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 14000 msl bound upper : 16000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : mmty |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : unknown |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 4700 flight time type : 100 |
ASRS Report | 282708 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : far non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other other : unspecified atc |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 6000 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
While on a descent into elp for a customs stop we were in mexican airspace being controled by juarez control. A traffic conflict occurred about 10 NM south of cjs VOR. Approximately 20 NM south of cjs, juarez control asked for a good rate of descent down to 110000 ft. At this point we were approximately descending through FL200. I believed that we were in radar contact at this point. A moment later juarez started asking us for our radial and DME from cjs and then started giving us information (radial) on a mexican airliner from cjs. At this time I looked down at my navigation display to see traffic 3500 ft below our altitude and climbing on the TCASII. Since I was descending at 3500 FPM (ATC asked for good rate) and we were told traffic was climbing to 16000 ft my instinct took over and I turned the aircraft immediately to the right. Approximately 20-30 seconds later we made visual contact with the airliner climbing through our altitude approximately 1-2 NM away. As I look back on this occurrence I realize that limiting my rate of descent while turning the aircraft would have given us the most time to locate the traffic. The root cause of this situation seems to be, radar contact or not, a blatant violation of aircraft separation by ATC. My copilot said after the occurrence that this was common practice by controllers down south not wanting to turn a national airliner. I hope this is not the case. There seems to be more to the problem than just turning an aircraft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: RPTR ALLEGES THE MEXICAN CTR DSNDED HIS ACFT IN CONFLICT WITH A CLBING ACFT AND WAS FACED WITH PROVIDING HIS OWN SEPARATION BY TURNING.
Narrative: WHILE ON A DSCNT INTO ELP FOR A CUSTOMS STOP WE WERE IN MEXICAN AIRSPACE BEING CTLED BY JUAREZ CTL. A TFC CONFLICT OCCURRED ABOUT 10 NM S OF CJS VOR. APPROX 20 NM S OF CJS, JUAREZ CTL ASKED FOR A GOOD RATE OF DSCNT DOWN TO 110000 FT. AT THIS POINT WE WERE APPROX DSNDING THROUGH FL200. I BELIEVED THAT WE WERE IN RADAR CONTACT AT THIS POINT. A MOMENT LATER JUAREZ STARTED ASKING US FOR OUR RADIAL AND DME FROM CJS AND THEN STARTED GIVING US INFO (RADIAL) ON A MEXICAN AIRLINER FROM CJS. AT THIS TIME I LOOKED DOWN AT MY NAV DISPLAY TO SEE TFC 3500 FT BELOW OUR ALT AND CLBING ON THE TCASII. SINCE I WAS DSNDING AT 3500 FPM (ATC ASKED FOR GOOD RATE) AND WE WERE TOLD TFC WAS CLBING TO 16000 FT MY INSTINCT TOOK OVER AND I TURNED THE ACFT IMMEDIATELY TO THE R. APPROX 20-30 SECONDS LATER WE MADE VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE AIRLINER CLBING THROUGH OUR ALT APPROX 1-2 NM AWAY. AS I LOOK BACK ON THIS OCCURRENCE I REALIZE THAT LIMITING MY RATE OF DSCNT WHILE TURNING THE ACFT WOULD HAVE GIVEN US THE MOST TIME TO LOCATE THE TFC. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS SIT SEEMS TO BE, RADAR CONTACT OR NOT, A BLATANT VIOLATION OF ACFT SEPARATION BY ATC. MY COPLT SAID AFTER THE OCCURRENCE THAT THIS WAS COMMON PRACTICE BY CTLRS DOWN S NOT WANTING TO TURN A NATIONAL AIRLINER. I HOPE THIS IS NOT THE CASE. THERE SEEMS TO BE MORE TO THE PROB THAN JUST TURNING AN ACFT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.