37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 283044 |
Time | |
Date | 199410 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : cmh |
State Reference | OH |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : ztl |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | PA-30 Twin Comanche |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 70 flight time total : 700 flight time type : 10 |
ASRS Report | 283044 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | other personnel other |
Qualification | other other : other |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
On oct/xx/93, I took off from cmh in my newly purchased 1966 piper twin comanche aircraft en route to ellington field, tx in IFR conditions, single pilot with no passenger. In nov to mid-dec/93, I flew the aircraft on 3 other trips in conditions ranging from VFR to IFR in all classes of airspace for a total of approximately 40 hours of flying time. In mid dec, I brought the aircraft to an a&P/ia mechanic at ellington field for annual inspection, under part 91 of the far, who found numerous serious problems with the aircraft requiring grounding of the aircraft. Thus, during the period prior to the annual inspection I was flying the aircraft while it was in a non-airworthy condition. At the time of the sale on oct/zz/93 the aircraft was 2 hours out of its previous annual by the previous owner and according to the paperwork had a current license and airworthy certificate. No accident or incident occurred during my flts, however, the situation demonstrated poor judgement and represented an unnecessary safety risk.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT OWNER OF AN SMA TWIN LEARNS DURING AN ANNUAL INSPECTION THAT HE HAS BEEN OPERATING THE ACFT IN AN UNAIRWORTHY CONDITION.
Narrative: ON OCT/XX/93, I TOOK OFF FROM CMH IN MY NEWLY PURCHASED 1966 PIPER TWIN COMANCHE ACFT ENRTE TO ELLINGTON FIELD, TX IN IFR CONDITIONS, SINGLE PLT WITH NO PAX. IN NOV TO MID-DEC/93, I FLEW THE ACFT ON 3 OTHER TRIPS IN CONDITIONS RANGING FROM VFR TO IFR IN ALL CLASSES OF AIRSPACE FOR A TOTAL OF APPROX 40 HRS OF FLYING TIME. IN MID DEC, I BROUGHT THE ACFT TO AN A&P/IA MECH AT ELLINGTON FIELD FOR ANNUAL INSPECTION, UNDER PART 91 OF THE FAR, WHO FOUND NUMEROUS SERIOUS PROBS WITH THE ACFT REQUIRING GNDING OF THE ACFT. THUS, DURING THE PERIOD PRIOR TO THE ANNUAL INSPECTION I WAS FLYING THE ACFT WHILE IT WAS IN A NON-AIRWORTHY CONDITION. AT THE TIME OF THE SALE ON OCT/ZZ/93 THE ACFT WAS 2 HRS OUT OF ITS PREVIOUS ANNUAL BY THE PREVIOUS OWNER AND ACCORDING TO THE PAPERWORK HAD A CURRENT LICENSE AND AIRWORTHY CERTIFICATE. NO ACCIDENT OR INCIDENT OCCURRED DURING MY FLTS, HOWEVER, THE SIT DEMONSTRATED POOR JUDGEMENT AND REPRESENTED AN UNNECESSARY SAFETY RISK.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.