Narrative:

Operating a FK28 we taxied to runway 36L at clt. Cleared for takeoff runway 36L. On departure roll approximately 3000 ft down the runway I called V1. Almost immediately the airplane was buffeted and the airspeed decreased approximately 8 KTS. I noticed that an aircraft was on the departure roll on runway 5. I think the aircraft was an fk 100. Departure ATIS information was current and advised that simultaneous departures were in progress from runways 36L and 5. Since the runways are controled by different tower frequencys we were unaware of the timing of the runway 5 departures. Since we had not began our rotation the jet blast resulted in nothing more than a surprise and a nuisance. If we had already started our rotation, or if the aircraft departing on runway 5 had been larger, or if we had been in a smaller aircraft the incident would have been more significant.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FK-28 SUFFERS JET BLAST ENCOUNTER ON TKOF PROC AT CLT.

Narrative: OPERATING A FK28 WE TAXIED TO RWY 36L AT CLT. CLRED FOR TKOF RWY 36L. ON DEP ROLL APPROX 3000 FT DOWN THE RWY I CALLED V1. ALMOST IMMEDIATELY THE AIRPLANE WAS BUFFETED AND THE AIRSPD DECREASED APPROX 8 KTS. I NOTICED THAT AN ACFT WAS ON THE DEP ROLL ON RWY 5. I THINK THE ACFT WAS AN FK 100. DEP ATIS INFO WAS CURRENT AND ADVISED THAT SIMULTANEOUS DEPS WERE IN PROGRESS FROM RWYS 36L AND 5. SINCE THE RWYS ARE CTLED BY DIFFERENT TWR FREQS WE WERE UNAWARE OF THE TIMING OF THE RWY 5 DEPS. SINCE WE HAD NOT BEGAN OUR ROTATION THE JET BLAST RESULTED IN NOTHING MORE THAN A SURPRISE AND A NUISANCE. IF WE HAD ALREADY STARTED OUR ROTATION, OR IF THE ACFT DEPARTING ON RWY 5 HAD BEEN LARGER, OR IF WE HAD BEEN IN A SMALLER ACFT THE INCIDENT WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE SIGNIFICANT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.