37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 285744 |
Time | |
Date | 199410 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : phx |
State Reference | AZ |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 6000 msl bound upper : 6000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : phx |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure other departure sid : sid |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 305 flight time total : 1270 flight time type : 1018 |
ASRS Report | 285744 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Upon departing phx on runway 26L using the mobie 3 departure, we failed to turn to the published heading of 240 degrees and instead flew the runway heading of 260 degrees. Although no adverse consequences followed our action, phx tower asked us why we missed the turn. The captain and myself did review the departure before takeoff, however, we missed the turn anyway confusing the departure with the eagle 2 departure in which the published heading is to fly runway heading 26R. We perform both departures frequently and it is my opinion that phx departure procedures are too complicated and confusing. It is much more effective to utilize a departure procedure such as denver uses. Radar vectors to intercept a filed course.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF AN LTT FAILED TO TURN AFTER TKOF TO THE PUBLISHED SID HDG.
Narrative: UPON DEPARTING PHX ON RWY 26L USING THE MOBIE 3 DEP, WE FAILED TO TURN TO THE PUBLISHED HDG OF 240 DEGS AND INSTEAD FLEW THE RWY HDG OF 260 DEGS. ALTHOUGH NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWED OUR ACTION, PHX TWR ASKED US WHY WE MISSED THE TURN. THE CAPT AND MYSELF DID REVIEW THE DEP BEFORE TKOF, HOWEVER, WE MISSED THE TURN ANYWAY CONFUSING THE DEP WITH THE EAGLE 2 DEP IN WHICH THE PUBLISHED HDG IS TO FLY RWY HDG 26R. WE PERFORM BOTH DEPS FREQUENTLY AND IT IS MY OPINION THAT PHX DEP PROCS ARE TOO COMPLICATED AND CONFUSING. IT IS MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE TO UTILIZE A DEP PROC SUCH AS DENVER USES. RADAR VECTORS TO INTERCEPT A FILED COURSE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.