37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 289295 |
Time | |
Date | 199411 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : dfw |
State Reference | TX |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bos |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 289295 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
A previous pilot's logbook write-up on an automatic air conditioning pack controller required maintenance corrective action and placement of MEL stickers. The flight release, logbook, and MEL stickers all reflected the same MEL corrective action. I checked and signed the flight release with the MEL number noted on the release. I also checked the aircraft and the logbook for proper placement of MEL stickers. The problem was that the MEL corrective action was not correct for the original write-up. Consequently, 8 pilots, including myself, did not notice the discrepancy. The aircraft had flown for 3 days with an MEL corrective action that did not satisfy the original write-up. The pilot receiving the aircraft from me happened to notice the discrepancy. In the future I will read the original write-up to be sure maintenance has complied with the proper MEL corrective action. The air conditioning pack controller that prompted the original write-up functioned normally - - in other words maintenance fixed something that wasn't broke!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MLG HAS MEL ACTION THAT DID NOT COVER THE ORIGINAL WRITE- UP PROB.
Narrative: A PREVIOUS PLT'S LOGBOOK WRITE-UP ON AN AUTOMATIC AIR CONDITIONING PACK CTLR REQUIRED MAINT CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PLACEMENT OF MEL STICKERS. THE FLT RELEASE, LOGBOOK, AND MEL STICKERS ALL REFLECTED THE SAME MEL CORRECTIVE ACTION. I CHKED AND SIGNED THE FLT RELEASE WITH THE MEL NUMBER NOTED ON THE RELEASE. I ALSO CHKED THE ACFT AND THE LOGBOOK FOR PROPER PLACEMENT OF MEL STICKERS. THE PROB WAS THAT THE MEL CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS NOT CORRECT FOR THE ORIGINAL WRITE-UP. CONSEQUENTLY, 8 PLTS, INCLUDING MYSELF, DID NOT NOTICE THE DISCREPANCY. THE ACFT HAD FLOWN FOR 3 DAYS WITH AN MEL CORRECTIVE ACTION THAT DID NOT SATISFY THE ORIGINAL WRITE-UP. THE PLT RECEIVING THE ACFT FROM ME HAPPENED TO NOTICE THE DISCREPANCY. IN THE FUTURE I WILL READ THE ORIGINAL WRITE-UP TO BE SURE MAINT HAS COMPLIED WITH THE PROPER MEL CORRECTIVE ACTION. THE AIR CONDITIONING PACK CTLR THAT PROMPTED THE ORIGINAL WRITE-UP FUNCTIONED NORMALLY - - IN OTHER WORDS MAINT FIXED SOMETHING THAT WASN'T BROKE!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.