Narrative:

I was making a VOR approach to runway 31 at sgj. AWOS reported 400 ft indefinite MDA is 400 ft with local altitude at 2.3 DME. I had local altimeter but was using a noncertified GPS for distance and did not notice that sgj DME was not functioning. No NOTAM was received from either duat or voice briefing to alert me. I knew of the MDA of 460 ft with DME out but not recognizing the DME OTS, descended to 400 ft. Just prior to that altitude, I broke out and made a normal landing. Even though I knew the 2.3 distance, I should have monitored DME. In fact, it should have been primary. My experience with the GPS has been so good with unbelievable accuracy that I have come to rely on it as my primary navigation instrument. I will have to change that. I do feel that the FAA needs to recognize this accuracy and certify many more units for en route and terminal IFR.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: DSCNT BELOW MINIMUMS. UNAUTH NAVAID USE.

Narrative: I WAS MAKING A VOR APCH TO RWY 31 AT SGJ. AWOS RPTED 400 FT INDEFINITE MDA IS 400 FT WITH LCL ALT AT 2.3 DME. I HAD LCL ALTIMETER BUT WAS USING A NONCERTIFIED GPS FOR DISTANCE AND DID NOT NOTICE THAT SGJ DME WAS NOT FUNCTIONING. NO NOTAM WAS RECEIVED FROM EITHER DUAT OR VOICE BRIEFING TO ALERT ME. I KNEW OF THE MDA OF 460 FT WITH DME OUT BUT NOT RECOGNIZING THE DME OTS, DSNDED TO 400 FT. JUST PRIOR TO THAT ALT, I BROKE OUT AND MADE A NORMAL LNDG. EVEN THOUGH I KNEW THE 2.3 DISTANCE, I SHOULD HAVE MONITORED DME. IN FACT, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRIMARY. MY EXPERIENCE WITH THE GPS HAS BEEN SO GOOD WITH UNBELIEVABLE ACCURACY THAT I HAVE COME TO RELY ON IT AS MY PRIMARY NAV INST. I WILL HAVE TO CHANGE THAT. I DO FEEL THAT THE FAA NEEDS TO RECOGNIZE THIS ACCURACY AND CERTIFY MANY MORE UNITS FOR ENRTE AND TERMINAL IFR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.