37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 301181 |
Time | |
Date | 199503 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lga |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 300 agl bound upper : 300 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lga |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | landing : go around other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 110 flight time total : 10900 flight time type : 650 |
ASRS Report | 301181 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : ground less severe conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 7000 vertical : 300 |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
Go around from 300 ft AGL due commuter ahead very slow clearing runway. After go around procedure was complete, and with stable altitude/speed/heading, I made a 15 second PA advising the airplane was ok and my intentions. Prior to departure, we had a maintenance delay of nearly an hour and I knew we had at least a dozen very angry passenger and I figured a go around obviously not WX related might upset some of the white-knuckle types. Under the circumstances, I felt a very short PA to calm everyone and keep them in their seats was appropriate. If we had to work in with other traffic (plenty of fuel), someone might have gotten up which would have been more distraction for the cockpit crew than my PA. As it was, we came right back for a normal landing (and cleared much sooner than the commuter had). I do not feel that my short PA violated the intent of 'sterile cockpit.' someone in authority/authorized might disagree.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN EVASIVE ACTION GAR NECESSITATES A PUBLIC ADDRESS ANNOUNCEMENT DURING THE STERILE COCKPIT PERIOD.
Narrative: GAR FROM 300 FT AGL DUE COMMUTER AHEAD VERY SLOW CLRING RWY. AFTER GAR PROC WAS COMPLETE, AND WITH STABLE ALT/SPD/HDG, I MADE A 15 SECOND PA ADVISING THE AIRPLANE WAS OK AND MY INTENTIONS. PRIOR TO DEP, WE HAD A MAINT DELAY OF NEARLY AN HR AND I KNEW WE HAD AT LEAST A DOZEN VERY ANGRY PAX AND I FIGURED A GAR OBVIOUSLY NOT WX RELATED MIGHT UPSET SOME OF THE WHITE-KNUCKLE TYPES. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, I FELT A VERY SHORT PA TO CALM EVERYONE AND KEEP THEM IN THEIR SEATS WAS APPROPRIATE. IF WE HAD TO WORK IN WITH OTHER TFC (PLENTY OF FUEL), SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN UP WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE DISTR FOR THE COCKPIT CREW THAN MY PA. AS IT WAS, WE CAME RIGHT BACK FOR A NORMAL LNDG (AND CLRED MUCH SOONER THAN THE COMMUTER HAD). I DO NOT FEEL THAT MY SHORT PA VIOLATED THE INTENT OF 'STERILE COCKPIT.' SOMEONE IN AUTH MIGHT DISAGREE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.