37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 304902 |
Time | |
Date | 199505 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : tpa |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1000 msl bound upper : 1000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : tpa tower : tpa tower : slc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | DC-9 50 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude descent : approach other |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 140 flight time total : 12500 flight time type : 5000 |
ASRS Report | 304902 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : declared emergency other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
During initial climb I noticed power loss on #1 engine. First officer was flying. I reduced power on #1 to prevent egt from exceeding the redline. During this tpa tower asked us to change to departure control. I acknowledged but did not immediately switch to departure control because of the cockpit workload. Once the aircraft was stabilized and the confign was cleaned up I recontacted tpa tower and informed them that I did not contact departure control because of an engine problem and I would be returning to the airport. Tower then asked me to contact departure again. Once on departure control I declared an emergency because of the engine problem and the impending overweight landing. I communicated with company, the lead flight attendant and passenger that we would be returning. My first officer flew a visual approach to runway 36L at tpa and made an uneventful approach and landing. We returned to our gate under our own power. All facets of our support operated flawlessly. Approach was helpful with radar vectors. Tpa tower had the emergency equipment standing by.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PWR LOSS OF #1 ENG ON DEP. RETURN LAND.
Narrative: DURING INITIAL CLB I NOTICED PWR LOSS ON #1 ENG. FO WAS FLYING. I REDUCED PWR ON #1 TO PREVENT EGT FROM EXCEEDING THE REDLINE. DURING THIS TPA TWR ASKED US TO CHANGE TO DEP CTL. I ACKNOWLEDGED BUT DID NOT IMMEDIATELY SWITCH TO DEP CTL BECAUSE OF THE COCKPIT WORKLOAD. ONCE THE ACFT WAS STABILIZED AND THE CONFIGN WAS CLEANED UP I RECONTACTED TPA TWR AND INFORMED THEM THAT I DID NOT CONTACT DEP CTL BECAUSE OF AN ENG PROB AND I WOULD BE RETURNING TO THE ARPT. TWR THEN ASKED ME TO CONTACT DEP AGAIN. ONCE ON DEP CTL I DECLARED AN EMER BECAUSE OF THE ENG PROB AND THE IMPENDING OVERWT LNDG. I COMMUNICATED WITH COMPANY, THE LEAD FLT ATTENDANT AND PAX THAT WE WOULD BE RETURNING. MY FO FLEW A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 36L AT TPA AND MADE AN UNEVENTFUL APCH AND LNDG. WE RETURNED TO OUR GATE UNDER OUR OWN PWR. ALL FACETS OF OUR SUPPORT OPERATED FLAWLESSLY. APCH WAS HELPFUL WITH RADAR VECTORS. TPA TWR HAD THE EMER EQUIP STANDING BY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.