37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 318789 |
Time | |
Date | 199510 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : ldn |
State Reference | VA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 31000 msl bound upper : 31000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zdc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 130 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 5600 |
ASRS Report | 318789 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 5200 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 319356 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
On our preflight checks we loaded our ONS waypoints from our flight plan. The printer was of poor to fair quality and most of the 3's could be mistaken for 8's or vice versa. That meant the first officer and I double checked all the waypoints with the commercial charts, especially those with 3's and 8's in the latitude/longitude. I circled the obviously flawed digits along the flight plan. The west longitude of colin intersection was especially troublesome. It was printed 33504N 97113W -- I was focusing on west longitude due to the poor printer quality and as I double checked the entire latitude/longitude from the commercial chart I apparently saw what I wanted to see 33504N 79118W. Thus I caught one printer error but missed another. The actual latitude/longitude for colin intersection is 38504N 79118W. My first officer crosschecked my work and made the same error. We transferred power from external power to APU power during the course of our preflight checks and then made a total mileage check of the ONS. The first check was 140 mi off. That should have clued us in but after a power change the ONS takes some time to get back up to speed so we checked it again and got a reading within 15 mi of the flight plan. 15 mi on a 3 hour and 32 min flight plan is close after a power transfer for ONS. As we got the alert light prior to colin intersection a frequency change occurred and the aircraft began its turn to a more southwesterly direction for little rock. We had been experiencing a heavy wind from 250 degree/95 KT up until that point and when the ONS called for more of a southerly heading we were each thinking maybe the wind had shifted. Another frequency change occurred then about the time we really questioned the ONS accuracy and disconnected it and began our turn back to a w-sw heading we got a call from center asking us our heading. We responded that we were experiencing ONS problems and they gave us a heading for charleston, wv, and flight plan route. We re-established our ONS and double checked colin intersection and discovered the north latitude was in error N3350.4 was printed on the flight plan and N3850.4 was the actual latitude. Obviously our professional pride was hurt but we had carefully corrected latitude/long for bwz 40479N 74493W and barns 42097N 7243.0W, along our route of flight but had both missed this one. Obviously in retrospect I should have ordered a new flight plan from another printer so there would be no question in any of the printed material waypoints. Our inbound equipment was late and we were not rushing but moving things along at a good pace. Again it was a night flight and cockpit lighting may have played a part in the misreading of the latitude/long. Next time, we all agree, the printer will be letter perfect and all our entries will be also.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: INCORRECT ONS LAT/LONG SET. POOR PRINTER AND DIGITS 3 AND 8 DIFFICULT TO DIFFERENTIATE.
Narrative: ON OUR PREFLT CHKS WE LOADED OUR ONS WAYPOINTS FROM OUR FLT PLAN. THE PRINTER WAS OF POOR TO FAIR QUALITY AND MOST OF THE 3'S COULD BE MISTAKEN FOR 8'S OR VICE VERSA. THAT MEANT THE FO AND I DOUBLE CHKED ALL THE WAYPOINTS WITH THE COMMERCIAL CHARTS, ESPECIALLY THOSE WITH 3'S AND 8'S IN THE LATITUDE/LONGITUDE. I CIRCLED THE OBVIOUSLY FLAWED DIGITS ALONG THE FLT PLAN. THE WEST LONGITUDE OF COLIN INTXN WAS ESPECIALLY TROUBLESOME. IT WAS PRINTED 33504N 97113W -- I WAS FOCUSING ON W LONGITUDE DUE TO THE POOR PRINTER QUALITY AND AS I DOUBLE CHKED THE ENTIRE LATITUDE/LONGITUDE FROM THE COMMERCIAL CHART I APPARENTLY SAW WHAT I WANTED TO SEE 33504N 79118W. THUS I CAUGHT ONE PRINTER ERROR BUT MISSED ANOTHER. THE ACTUAL LATITUDE/LONGITUDE FOR COLIN INTXN IS 38504N 79118W. MY FO XCHKED MY WORK AND MADE THE SAME ERROR. WE TRANSFERRED PWR FROM EXTERNAL PWR TO APU PWR DURING THE COURSE OF OUR PREFLT CHKS AND THEN MADE A TOTAL MILEAGE CHK OF THE ONS. THE FIRST CHK WAS 140 MI OFF. THAT SHOULD HAVE CLUED US IN BUT AFTER A PWR CHANGE THE ONS TAKES SOME TIME TO GET BACK UP TO SPD SO WE CHKED IT AGAIN AND GOT A READING WITHIN 15 MI OF THE FLT PLAN. 15 MI ON A 3 HR AND 32 MIN FLT PLAN IS CLOSE AFTER A PWR TRANSFER FOR ONS. AS WE GOT THE ALERT LIGHT PRIOR TO COLIN INTXN A FREQ CHANGE OCCURRED AND THE ACFT BEGAN ITS TURN TO A MORE SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION FOR LITTLE ROCK. WE HAD BEEN EXPERIENCING A HVY WIND FROM 250 DEG/95 KT UP UNTIL THAT POINT AND WHEN THE ONS CALLED FOR MORE OF A SOUTHERLY HDG WE WERE EACH THINKING MAYBE THE WIND HAD SHIFTED. ANOTHER FREQ CHANGE OCCURRED THEN ABOUT THE TIME WE REALLY QUESTIONED THE ONS ACCURACY AND DISCONNECTED IT AND BEGAN OUR TURN BACK TO A W-SW HDG WE GOT A CALL FROM CTR ASKING US OUR HDG. WE RESPONDED THAT WE WERE EXPERIENCING ONS PROBS AND THEY GAVE US A HDG FOR CHARLESTON, WV, AND FLT PLAN RTE. WE RE-ESTABLISHED OUR ONS AND DOUBLE CHKED COLIN INTXN AND DISCOVERED THE N LAT WAS IN ERROR N3350.4 WAS PRINTED ON THE FLT PLAN AND N3850.4 WAS THE ACTUAL LAT. OBVIOUSLY OUR PROFESSIONAL PRIDE WAS HURT BUT WE HAD CAREFULLY CORRECTED LAT/LONG FOR BWZ 40479N 74493W AND BARNS 42097N 7243.0W, ALONG OUR RTE OF FLT BUT HAD BOTH MISSED THIS ONE. OBVIOUSLY IN RETROSPECT I SHOULD HAVE ORDERED A NEW FLT PLAN FROM ANOTHER PRINTER SO THERE WOULD BE NO QUESTION IN ANY OF THE PRINTED MATERIAL WAYPOINTS. OUR INBOUND EQUIP WAS LATE AND WE WERE NOT RUSHING BUT MOVING THINGS ALONG AT A GOOD PACE. AGAIN IT WAS A NIGHT FLT AND COCKPIT LIGHTING MAY HAVE PLAYED A PART IN THE MISREADING OF THE LAT/LONG. NEXT TIME, WE ALL AGREE, THE PRINTER WILL BE LETTER PERFECT AND ALL OUR ENTRIES WILL BE ALSO.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.