Narrative:

Slc has issued 3 new arrs, the jammn, bear, and carter arrs. I believe they are unsafe for 2 reasons. The large amount of information on the chart requires a great deal of 'head in the cockpit' time. Both north and south arrs on the same plate is an altitude excursion waiting to happen, and in fact has. I believe the problem arose when ATC moved their workload into the cockpit. The contributing factor is that ATC issues these plates without getting any end user input. I discovered the problem when the arrival aircraft ahead of me broke an altitude. My suggestion for a corrective action is 2 plates, 1 for north and 1 for south arrs. Plus the elimination of the many 10-20 mi segments on various VOR's during the arrival.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NEW ARRS CAUSE FLC CONFUSION.

Narrative: SLC HAS ISSUED 3 NEW ARRS, THE JAMMN, BEAR, AND CARTER ARRS. I BELIEVE THEY ARE UNSAFE FOR 2 REASONS. THE LARGE AMOUNT OF INFO ON THE CHART REQUIRES A GREAT DEAL OF 'HEAD IN THE COCKPIT' TIME. BOTH N AND S ARRS ON THE SAME PLATE IS AN ALT EXCURSION WAITING TO HAPPEN, AND IN FACT HAS. I BELIEVE THE PROB AROSE WHEN ATC MOVED THEIR WORKLOAD INTO THE COCKPIT. THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR IS THAT ATC ISSUES THESE PLATES WITHOUT GETTING ANY END USER INPUT. I DISCOVERED THE PROB WHEN THE ARR ACFT AHEAD OF ME BROKE AN ALT. MY SUGGESTION FOR A CORRECTIVE ACTION IS 2 PLATES, 1 FOR N AND 1 FOR S ARRS. PLUS THE ELIMINATION OF THE MANY 10-20 MI SEGMENTS ON VARIOUS VOR'S DURING THE ARR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.